Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 36

Threaded View

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khatovar View Post
    I had no hand in this decision, but I feel pretty at ease with the concept that it ISN'T some sort of sly infiltration. I lean heavily towards it being more along the lines of people coming here to ask about boxing and being shut out because we don't discuss what they use.

    Someone comes here, they post, they mention that program and they get a postlock right out of the gate; that's not exactly welcoming. So they don't come back, they don't learn that there's better options out there and they end up going elsewhere and believing whatever someone else feeds them. Why continue to post here when no one can tell you anything good or bad about the program you are using, no one can help you with it, no one can troubleshoot your issues or help you get better at multiboxing in general because what you use is a taboo topic? That's conterproductive to the user and the community.

    What IS productive is being able to have a new user come in, say "I use this and want to do that" and having a community that can say "I don't know how to do that with that program, but I know with this other one you can do it this way..." instead of "We don't discuss that program here. Go away. /thread"

    Doing that makes it look like WE are being catty and frankly, that's a win for Pwnboxer, because there is no place where anyone can freely say anything negative or contrary to what he puts out there. You certainly aren't going to find a post like THIS on his forums, and until now, you couldn't find it here either.
    So what your saying and what the thread showed is that we now have facts based moderator approved pwnboxer bashing for the benefit of isboxer.
    Last edited by Fat Tire : 05-14-2011 at 03:04 PM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •