my question was actually boylston how 1 hunter (as the leader) would do in pvp paired with 4 easy classes, like druid healer + 3 dot locks, or even 3 boomkins, ...
my question was actually boylston how 1 hunter (as the leader) would do in pvp paired with 4 easy classes, like druid healer + 3 dot locks, or even 3 boomkins, ...
Everything that is fun in life is either bad for your health, immoral or illegal!
I think that would work OK. I don't know that it's any different than running any other mixed range DPS group. Some pet utility might be nice, and some of the defensive cooldown stuff would certainly be easier to manage. I almost think you'd rather have the hunter as an alt and not the main, but it would probably be a decent main.Originally Posted by zenga
I always prefer reducing the number of classes on a team for PvP purposes. I don't think the additional complexity is always a benefit, even if you get nice buff synergies. Pallies and Shaman used to be nicer than they are now because you could take the single class and get buff benefits of multiple classes. Alas, that's changed a lot.
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us