Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 23

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    I'm 100% in favor of boosting being nerfed and 5 man exp better. Maybe that's the "get off my lawn" attitude because I've leveled many 5 man teams via dungeons VS boosting

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svpernova09 View Post
    I'm 100% in favor of boosting being nerfed and 5 man exp better. Maybe that's the "get off my lawn" attitude because I've leveled many 5 man teams via dungeons VS boosting
    Except, it didn't take you 45mins to do a run and '5 man exp better' is relative to the awful amount it was before the buff. In my testing, it's just about the same as questing or 1 and 1/2 level per hour. Without RAF.

  3. #3

    Default

    If my goal is end game with my team I will take the route of least resistance. If my goal is enjoying dungeons then it doesn't matter how long leveling takes because once I hit max level I will just start a new team.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pocahuntess View Post
    Except, it didn't take you 45mins to do a run and '5 man exp better' is relative to the awful amount it was before the buff. In my testing, it's just about the same as questing or 1 and 1/2 level per hour. Without RAF.
    To clarify my point, I'm OK with running 5 man at level dungeons being better XP than boosting with a high level character. I realize that may not be a popular opinion, but that's what I meant.

  5. #5
    Member luxlunae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1431
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svpernova09 View Post
    To clarify my point, I'm OK with running 5 man at level dungeons being better XP than boosting with a high level character. I realize that may not be a popular opinion, but that's what I meant.
    That sounds reasonable to me as well. In general you guys are describing a world that sounds acceptable (1.5 levels per dungeon?), maybe need to try my dungeon teams again.

    My problem with "If my goal is end game with my team I will take the route of least resistance. If my goal is enjoying dungeons then it doesn't matter how long leveling takes because once I hit max level I will just start a new team." as an argument is that I LOVE leveling through dungeons, but if you get stuck in an expac where you are getting the same dungeon over and over and it is a shitty one, I don't want to run dungeons I hate more than once on a team.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svpernova09 View Post
    To clarify my point, I'm OK with running 5 man at level dungeons being better XP than boosting with a high level character. I realize that may not be a popular opinion, but that's what I meant.
    At level groups should definitely reward more experience than boosted groups per completion. I even agree that it should be slightly more in a xp per hour sense. Specifically, at level random dungeon groups should not be worse than boosting. At level specific dungeon groups should also be "not worse" than boosting.

    I also think leveling secondary characters should be significantly faster than leveling first characters. On par with all alts have 300% RAF ish XP, but not level grants (make heirlooms grant a much bigger bonus).

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •