Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Showing results 11 to 17 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    I'm going to jump into this late and say that I highly recommend hyper-threading because you can see the difference in the Multiboxing Hardware Science sticky. Now that MoP is upon us with some slight updates I plan to redo these tests, but I can only assume the results will be the same. If you like eye candy and some higher FPS, hyper-threading is the way to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by 3box View Post
    The thing that impresses me the most though is the ssd. This is my first one, and wow. I know it will probably die in a year, so I'll back it up every few weeks.
    Why do people say this? SSDs do not die in a year, and if they do, they're under warranty. If you bought an SSD with a 1 year warranty, you can expect it to break because the manufacturer doesn't even believe it's going to work past the 1 year mark. Most SSDs have a 3-5 year warranty anyway.

    Here's a 256GB Samsung 830 that's had 4 PETABYTES (Pic / Wikipedia) of data written to it as of today. Can anyone here even fathom 4 petabytes of data in a non-server environment?

    Quote Originally Posted by jstanthr View Post
    IMO go with the ivy bridge, the sandy bridge has a chance of stuttering depending on your HDD/SSD setup, it's primarily due to the way the SATA bus interfaces with the PCIE lanes that are available, Ivy bridge is a lot more futrure proof as well.
    I have never ever heard this mentioned before, but he should​ be looking at Ivy Bridge CPUs anyway as they're the bigger, slightly hotter, brother of Sandy Bridge.

  2. #2
    Member Alge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MiRai View Post
    Can anyone here even fathom 4 petabytes of data in a non-server environment?
    Yes, that's 4x10^15 bytes. It's 1MB/s for 4x10^9 seconds, which is, of course, just shy of 127 years. Isn't Maths fun?

  3. #3
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alge View Post
    Yes, that's 4x10^15 bytes. It's 1MB/s for 4x10^9 seconds, which is, of course, just shy of 127 years. Isn't Maths fun?

  4. #4

    Default

    I find that hyper-threading matters more in Videos than playing WoW. I am talking you-tube, twitch and embedded video. I guess Hulu and stuff from Fox or TNT also count. I changed to Chrome and it helps some (from Firefox) but my i5-750 is still working it's data to the bin.
    RAF Tour Guide files are obsolete, I went to Zygor
    MultiBoxers play with themselves

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jstanthr View Post
    IMO go with the ivy bridge, the sandy bridge has a chance of stuttering depending on your HDD/SSD setup, it's primarily due to the way the SATA bus interfaces with the PCIE lanes that are available, Ivy bridge is a lot more futrure proof as well.
    Can you substantiate this claim? I'm using a i7-2600 which is a sandy bridge cpu, never had any problem with stuttering.

  6. #6

    Default

    Thanks for the discussions everyone. I went with an i5-3570K o/c to about 4.2Ghz , ASUS P8Z77-V PRO, 16GB Ram and from the money I saved by not buying an i7 I got an 64GB Samsung 830 Series SSD.

    The machine is amazing compared to my old one, the SSD makes everything fly and I can run around Orgrimmar with my main on high gfx and 4 slaves on low gfx with about 25fps! Yay!
    Last edited by Khatovar : 09-13-2012 at 10:37 AM
    Jafula.
    Jamba - Jafula's Awesome Multi Boxer Assistant. An addon for YOU.

  7. #7

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •