I have an ethical question, I remember it has been addressed somewhere here but not fully resolved.
A friend of mine ran an instance last night and suspected that someone was dualboxing (melee dps + priest), from the way they moved, and the fact that the priest seems to lag behind and not very talkative, and then always follows the melee. A couple info:
1. My friend is NOT against dual boxing. He's well aware who we are, and he plans to do it sometime in the future for RAF bonus too.
2. The healer did an okay job (not terribly good, but good enough for non-heroics outland instance), but the melee dps was awful.
And he resented the fact that those two didn't admit that they're dual boxers, if they are. His points:
1. you should always warn your party if you are a dual boxer. People may or may not accept you, that's their choice.
2. you get twice as many rolls for loot drops
3. two toons controlled by a single person can't be as good as two toons controlled by two people, assuming same level of player skill. My counter argument is that this way two toons are actually controlled by the same person and therefore more coordinated, but it doesn't really make sense because you are in a group of 5, and not just a group of 2.
What do you guys think? Is this sort of behavior okay or no?
So far I have leveled a pally + priest couple to 50 all "solo" (duo, whatever). I've only grouped once with a third person for a rare escort quest, and even so, I made sure the second toon is "talkative" and "reactive" enough so that he never suspected that we're the same person. But I'm wondering that once we reach 60 and RAF bonus is gone, we would have to run outland instances for gears / XP.
I'm not necessarily looking for a clear cut answer here, but just general opinions whether dualboxing / triple boxing in instances when grouped with other people okay or not.
My server is Proudmoore btw, so multiboxers are not that rare, but not ubiquitous either.
Connect With Us