Large World PvP Teams in Legion

[Mosg2]

My thoughts on large-scale multiboxing in Legion is not so much concerning the raid setup: I just wish you uncontrollable itching on your balls and get cramps in your arms at the same time.

I've been here for 8 years, and you're the first person on my ignore list. Grats Zenga for being an unworthwhile human being.

are you really this oblivious OP? you are setting yourself for disappointment.

the pvp world content will obviously disable follow like any recent pvp content has, and if it doesn't and people bitch too much about it (and they will if you run around with 15 accounts thinking anyone besides you is having fun) then the easiest solution for blizzard will be to just disable follow completely and be done with it.

from the looks of it legion will be the end of it. and most of the blame lies with boxers just like you, ruining the fun for everyone, other multiboxers included.

If they were going to disable follow everywhere, they'd have done it. It wasn't boxers that got follow removed from BGs, it was bots.

@Mirai
There's a huge difference between what boxers on Emerald Dream are/were doing and what I've outlined above, and you know it. Don't be disingenuous. I've never advocated intentionally increasing lag in an area and I have no intention of doing so as I move to 40 (pets, toys, etc). Quest hubs in Tanaan Jungle regularly had 60+ people on the other side as I assaulted with 15, and moving to 40 wouldn't even put me on even footing considering the population on Sargeras.

There's a world of difference between showing up with enough toons and acoutrement to force server lag/potential crashing and showing up with enough toons for a fair fight. Is this really what we've become here? Is the difference in outlook between a light (5) multiboxer and a heavy (15+) multiboxer the same as a solo player and a light?

I get that people are scared of losing their niche in gaming over other people intentionally being an asshole, but where do you draw the asshole line? Is it 10? 15? 20?

What happened on Emerald Dream was an intentional, divisive choice and doesn't represent me or people like me, and I think largely doesn't represent multiboxers in general.

[MultiBear]

...but where do you draw the asshole line?

I don't think it's (just) a matter of numbers. I'd say you've drawn it pretty well yourself (and stepped over it) in your original post when you stated this:

I was unable to lock down quest hubs due to the number of Alliance in the area, and I imagine 40 will fix that pretty quick

Your goal seems to be to cause such disruption all by yourself. Something which, as MiRai has stated as well, is a far more dynamic thing when it's done by a group of individual players given the amount of effort involved.

In my book, this is the kind of crap that gives multiboxers a bad name.

[Mosg2]

I don't think it's (just) a matter of numbers. I'd say you've drawn it pretty well yourself (and stepped over it) in your original post when you stated this:



Your goal seems to be to cause such disruption all by yourself. Something which, as MiRai has stated as well, is a far more dynamic thing when it's done by a group of individual players given the amount of effort involved.

In my book, this is the kind of crap that gives multiboxers a bad name.

If 40 people get together and lock down a quest hub on a pvp server, we say 'pvp happened on a pvp server'. But if a boxer does it, he crosses the asshole line? I don't agree with that statement at all. We're not talking about a 1:1 server, we're talking about a 9:1 against me, where pvp is still incredibly uphill with 15. Even if I had 40, I don't think I could lock down Tanaan during prime time.