Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 214

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MiRai View Post

    You're not going to get a reply that says "X feature is allowed." How many times do people have to keep repeating this?
    X feature is not allowed is very similar to X feature is allowed, just a matter on semantics and which what we do to our checklist, tick or cross

    Ive already gotten a response as to what is not allowed, however am not taking that is "everything i did not mention is allowed" so excuse me on wanting clarification

  2. #2
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thedevilyouknow View Post
    X feature is not allowed is very similar to X feature is allowed, just a matter on semantics and which what we do to our checklist, tick or cross

    Ive already gotten a response as to what is not allowed, however am not taking that is "everything i did not mention is allowed" so excuse me on wanting clarification
    So, when they say that X feature is allowed, and then X feature changes because it's out of their control... Then what? Then you wait for a new response? What if they change their minds about feature X in two months and they stop allowing it? Are you on a mailing list to get that updated information? What if you don't know that they changed their mind for that one feature and now you're at risk for using it?

    This is the exact same in every single game that we, as players, multibox. Blizzard doesn't tell us what features aren't allowed, they give us a guideline for what is allowed and we adhere to it because they would never, and probably cannot legally, state publicly, on their forum, what features of X third-party program are allowed, and aren't allowed. The same goes for Trion, SquareEnix, CCP, NCSoft, etc. because if they do not control what that feature of the third-party program can do, then they cannot make that statement with confidence. If they were to give specifics like what you're asking, then people would take those statements, build a setup around that statement, and then try to play innocent when the banhammer comes because they weren't actually adhering the original guideline.

    Video FX can break the "one action, per key press, per game client" rule set by CCP if you configure them a certain way, so for them to specifically state that the Video FX feature is 100% allowed would be highly unlikely. So, instead, they say what is allowed, which is "one action, per key press, per game client," and you adhere to those rules instead.

    With everything said above, I'm not here to argue about what others have or haven't been adhering to and why they've been the victim of temporary suspensions, I'm just making an argument for why you won't get them to state that X feature is allowed, and even if you could, it's likely unofficial or "off the record."
    Do not send me a PM if what you want to talk about isn't absolutely private.
    Ask your questions on the forum where others can also benefit from the information.

    Author of the almost unknown and heavily neglected blog: Multiboxology

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MiRai View Post
    So, instead, they say what is allowed, which is "one action, per key press, per game client," and you adhere to those rules instead.
    You clearly haven't been paying attention, they sent out petitions in copy paste glory, they've changed their stance

    Even those who may have previously abiding by the 1 to 1 rule, if anyone is overly efficient to anyone else who plays the game then the multiboxer would get banned

    So in that regard, if they can change the statemented "rule" they made official - unofficially - then it isn't too much to ask for what is if they have already listed every other feature of isboxer as illegal or legal and im waiting for the last little clarification

  4. #4
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thedevilyouknow View Post
    You clearly haven't been paying attention, they sent out petitions in copy paste glory, they've changed their stance

    Even those who may have previously abiding by the 1 to 1 rule, if anyone is overly efficient to anyone else who plays the game then the multiboxer would get banned

    So in that regard, if they can change the statemented "rule" they made official - unofficially - then it isn't too much to ask for what is if they have already listed every other feature of isboxer as illegal or legal and im waiting for the last little clarification
    Well, on one hand you ignored my entire post and picked out one sentence, and on the other hand, you've reinforced exactly why it's silly to ask for specifics, but I'd also ask that you provide a link to CCP giving an unofficial statement about how being too efficient when multiboxing will land you a ban, because if you don't have a link then it's based purely upon the speculation in this thread.
    Do not send me a PM if what you want to talk about isn't absolutely private.
    Ask your questions on the forum where others can also benefit from the information.

    Author of the almost unknown and heavily neglected blog: Multiboxology

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •