Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 150

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shadowandlight View Post
    Thanks for the input so far guys, I am trying to curb some of the more aggressive tones in my arguments and provide rational points of view based in facts.

    Keep the ideas coming, I would like to get this out in an "official" format in a day or 2.
    Avoid mentioning things like how we can get around CCP's new policy...like you did here in the eve forums

    "Could you speak to other features, it's very easy for those of us experienced in ISBoxer to get around the input duplication with other features. specifically:

    - round robin keys
    - keymaping
    - video fx
    - menus
    - clickbars"

    When you mention that we can work around policy, it will enforce the idea that CCP should just ban ISBoxer completely, while the idea is "why are they banning input broadcasting they (we) can just do their (our) best to work around it" its more "oh they can work around the ban on input broadcasting, lets just ban isboxer and be done with it"
    Any mention of work around(s) are usually met with bitterness from the community, it's like you're rubbing it in their face

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thedevilyouknow View Post
    Avoid mentioning things like how we can get around CCP's new policy...like you did here in the eve forums

    "Could you speak to other features, it's very easy for those of us experienced in ISBoxer to get around the input duplication with other features. specifically:

    - round robin keys
    - keymaping
    - video fx
    - menus
    - clickbars"

    When you mention that we can work around policy, it will enforce the idea that CCP should just ban ISBoxer completely, while the idea is "why are they banning input broadcasting they (we) can just do their (our) best to work around it" its more "oh they can work around the ban on input broadcasting, lets just ban isboxer and be done with it"
    Any mention of work around(s) are usually met with bitterness from the community, it's like you're rubbing it in their face
    All this document is doing is getting all functions in isboxer bannable offenses... you think you're making a point why isboxing with multibroadcasting shouldn't be banned because it can be done with other functions...

    ccp and isboxerhaters are reading a full expo on wich other fucntions need to be banned so you do not get extra advantages using software.

    I multibox but this is what it comes down to:
    1)i use no software and i control 10 clients vs I use extra software to control 10 clients - nothing really changes
    2) I use no softwar and can control 4 clients effiencient vs I can control 10 clients with the software and gain 6 clients cuz of it \O/
    3) i use 6 clients and have to manage a shitton of things vs I still control 10 clients with software and gain 4 clients and its just as easy i would control 1 client while keeping in mind i would go battshitcrazy if i had to clickfest on the 6 clients serperatly...


    > note that i know how hard it is to set isboxer up perfectly and what happens when you fuck up BUT you are still onces ready with the setup and once you are running adding 6 clients to your control that you would not be able to do without it.


    Lets start PRing and advocate to ccp to allow us to keep the options open and handle petition about multiboxing on a case by case view. The change will happen, its just a matter of damage control
    Last edited by Khatovar : 12-05-2014 at 11:07 AM Reason: excessive vulgarity

Tags for this Thread

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •