oFollow Discussion

[Fat Tire]

"Accomplishments"?. Sorry, but my accomplishments in life, are not derived from a fictitious virtual world in which I participate for the sole sake of my own enjoyment.

I dont care about ofollow, follow in random bgs or even random bgs. I just quoted this statement because I could not agree with it more.

You guys that like random bgs might want to pay attention to the ptr. Role checks and the end of oqueue in randoms.

Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@Wiredmana Agreed, Premades ruin unrated battlegrounds. Working on making it difficult to do. Sad a cool addon like oQueue does this


Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@CuddlyKittyHugs @Wiredmana I've said a few times, the only part of oQueue I don't like is circumventing premade restrictions

[Owltoid]

I dont care about ofollow, follow in random bgs or even random bgs. I just quoted this statement because I could not agree with it more.

You guys that like random bgs might want to pay attention to the ptr. Role checks and the end of oqueue in randoms.

Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@Wiredmana Agreed, Premades ruin unrated battlegrounds. Working on making it difficult to do. Sad a cool addon like oQueue does this


Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@CuddlyKittyHugs @Wiredmana I've said a few times, the only part of oQueue I don't like is circumventing premade restrictions

Yes, yes, we've been through this "accomplishments" debate before, which is the whole reason I put it in parentheses. Next time I'll put it in italics and pink font to help clear confusion.

It's premature to call the end of oQueue. Hopefully it's just the end of greater than 5 man random BG premades. Blizzard doesn't care about an addon that helps you find 4 players to play with cross servers, they care about bringing more than 5 in a coordinated fashion.

But you already knew all this stuff, and it doesn't belong in this thread.

[zenga]

I dont care about ofollow, follow in random bgs or even random bgs. I just quoted this statement because I could not agree with it more.

You guys that like random bgs might want to pay attention to the ptr. Role checks and the end of oqueue in randoms.

Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@Wiredmana Agreed, Premades ruin unrated battlegrounds. Working on making it difficult to do. Sad a cool addon like oQueue does this


Holinka ‏@holinka30 Mar
@CuddlyKittyHugs @Wiredmana I've said a few times, the only part of oQueue I don't like is circumventing premade restrictions

Oqueue doesn't circumvent premade restrictions as far as I know. You can queue up with a group of 5 players for random bg's, and oqueue doesn't circumvent that restriction. All it does is making it easier to find people to queue up together: it saves you from spamming forums, raidfinder, trade etc ... to find a team.

[Fat Tire]

Oqueue doesn't circumvent premade restrictions as far as I know. You can queue up with a group of 5 players for random bg's, and oqueue doesn't circumvent that restriction. All it does is making it easier to find people to queue up together: it saves you from spamming forums, raidfinder, trade etc ... to find a team.

No idea, as I dont use it. Obviously blizzard has more information than I do since they believe its an issue. I was just linking the tweets from the newly acquired senior pvp developer who has been around for roughly 2 months or so and letting people know about the role check for random bgs on the ptr.