Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 63

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Tire View Post
    I could 100 box or whatever amount I wished to spend, finances have nothing to do with the decision. The op asked if 5-boxing was pointless, not if it was dead. I have yet to see a valid argument why 5 boxing is better than 3 though.
    Slow down there, Cowboy, I wasn't talking about you with mention of finances. I was simply saying that finances are a limiting factor for some. There is no argument why one is better, just like someone can't prove that multiboxing is better than solo play. It's individual play styles and how peeps want to spend their time. We certainly don't need to list the advantages of three boxing or the advantages of five boxing or the advantages of 17 boxing - we all know them. The question was is 5 boxing dead, not "is FatTire justified 3 boxing when clearly 5 boxing is better?"

    5 boxing is not dead, and in comparison to last expansion it has more options. Feel free to make a thread why 3 boxing is the bee's knees.
    Owltoid, Thatblueguy, Thisblueguy, Otherblueguy, Whichblueguy

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Owltoid View Post
    The question was is 5 boxing dead, not "is FatTire justified 3 boxing when clearly 5 boxing is better?"
    Actually little darlin, the question was not if 5 boxing was dead, re read the title and op.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Tire View Post
    Actually little darlin, the question was not if 5 boxing was dead, re read the title and op.
    Good point (other than calling a dude little darlin, but whatever floats your boat). It had been a long time since reading the original message which seems much more focused on three boxing than asking if 5 boxing is pointless.
    Owltoid, Thatblueguy, Thisblueguy, Otherblueguy, Whichblueguy

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Owltoid View Post
    Good point (other than calling a dude little darlin, but whatever floats your boat). It had been a long time since reading the original message which seems much more focused on three boxing than asking if 5 boxing is pointless.
    I thought with the use of Cowboy we were adding a western motif to the thread and I was just adding to it. Yes, I believe the reason Ebony made the thread was because he/she had determined that 3 boxing provided him/her the same play style as 5 along with some benefits that come with 3(financial,less qq,same rewards etc) and recently for Ebony more success in bgs.
    Last edited by Fat Tire : 12-20-2012 at 01:38 PM Reason: gender........

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Tire View Post
    I thought with the use of Cowboy we were adding a western motif to the thread and I was just adding to it. Yes, I believe the reason Ebony made the thread was because he/she had determined that 3 boxing provided him/her the same play style as 5 along with some benefits that come with 3(financial,less qq,same rewards etc) and recently for Ebony more success in bgs.

    this was the point can i 3 box and it feel right. Will five i lose to much from five boxing.

    the other point was am doing better WITH the class i want to play with 3 (all casters no heals), not playing a class i have to because its op ATM.

    the other think if u read other topics about the ban waves and what blizzard said to be taking in big groups with other players and not pulling it off then they can temp ban me again and keep telling me to stop going into them "fair play" (they said this to me on a ticket i opened the other day)

    i seem to have no prob with 3 at all always top off kb's and good dmg.


    two be fair playing anymore then one char feels right




Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •