Recent Wave of Account Actions

[Void]

So finally got a response after all my bickering. Its now time for me to go back to work so I wont get to try it out for another week. Maybe a glimmer of hope exists.

Hey there,

Thank you for your concerns about these recent account actions on your World of Warcraft accounts.

We took special care to fully investigate your situation, and have determined that the actions resulted in error due to detecting false positive information. Our automated systems are designed to detect inactivity in Battlegrounds, and the behavior of multiple "follow" characters created by the multiboxing play style does have a chance to trigger these detections, due to their individually low contributions to the match (although the character group as a whole is quite formidable).

I've made sure these actions cease to occur in the future. If you encounter and further difficulties with this, please let us know.

Regards,

Blizzard Entertainment
http://battle.net/support

[Sam DeathWalker]

due to their individually low contributions to the match (although the character group as a whole is quite formidable).

Kinda really sums up boxing there ...

[Lyonheart]

So finally got a response after all my bickering. Its now time for me to go back to work so I wont get to try it out for another week. Maybe a glimmer of hope exists.

Hey there,

Thank you for your concerns about these recent account actions on your World of Warcraft accounts.

We took special care to fully investigate your situation, and have determined that the actions resulted in error due to detecting false positive information. Our automated systems are designed to detect inactivity in Battlegrounds, and the behavior of multiple "follow" characters created by the multiboxing play style does have a chance to trigger these detections, due to their individually low contributions to the match (although the character group as a whole is quite formidable).

I've made sure these actions cease to occur in the future. If you encounter and further difficulties with this, please let us know.

Regards,

Blizzard Entertainment
http://battle.net/support

That makes me feel better.. i know in AV my followers would go afk a lot just following me around, or if i was controlling a tower/bunker.. so i would have to jump a lot to keep them active..i hope it was a simple as that 8) Thats easy to watch and fix.

[Feehza]

So finally got a response after all my bickering. Its now time for me to go back to work so I wont get to try it out for another week. Maybe a glimmer of hope exists.

Hey there,

Thank you for your concerns about these recent account actions on your World of Warcraft accounts.

We took special care to fully investigate your situation, and have determined that the actions resulted in error due to detecting false positive information. Our automated systems are designed to detect inactivity in Battlegrounds, and the behavior of multiple "follow" characters created by the multiboxing play style does have a chance to trigger these detections, due to their individually low contributions to the match (although the character group as a whole is quite formidable).

I've made sure these actions cease to occur in the future. If you encounter and further difficulties with this, please let us know.

Regards,

Blizzard Entertainment
http://battle.net/support

I assumed that there is smt with follow and ISB.
Nox got a ban again few minutes ago after playing 2 hours BG. (he use ISBoxer/Jamba)


I played the whole weekend BG, no ban. My follow works via AHK, i only use ISB for mousebroadcasting and window swapping.
Kruschpak plays with Octopus, and he played few BGs too these days ... no ban

But, one of guild members use ISBoxer/Jamba for follow too and he still got no ban.

Strange.