3 Boxing for a fresh 80 monk

[promdates]

It's my understanding that you can't boost a single character with an 85 because of the lvl difference, (raf characters have to be within 5 lvls of each other to gain xp). You have to chain them A>B>C in order to make b and c get the bonus from the 85 leveling them.

Does this mean you RAF one account, then RAF another account to the previous RAF'd account?

[ntsaint]

Does this mean you RAF one account, then RAF another account to the previous RAF'd account?

Correct. Then you have 3 easy options you can run the 2 raf accounts alone, you can run the raf accounts with a new char from your main account, or you can boost with a lvl 85 through dungeons which is what I"m doing.

[crowdx]

Correct. Then you have 3 easy options you can run the 2 raf accounts alone, you can run the raf accounts with a new char from your main account, or you can boost with a lvl 85 through dungeons which is what I"m doing.

Correct me if I am wrong, but RaF to RaF also allows the granted levels to cascade between the RaF accounts? i.e. if I grant a character levels on the 2nd RaF from the 3rd RaF it then allows me to grant levels from the 2nd account to the first with the character that was granted llevel from 1 - 80 ?

[ntsaint]

Correct me if I am wrong, but RaF to RaF also allows the granted levels to cascade between the RaF accounts? i.e. if I grant a character levels on the 2nd RaF from the 3rd RaF it then allows me to grant levels from the 2nd account to the first with the character that was granted llevel from 1 - 80 ?

Correct! Levels granted can all be passed upwards although it has a dr of sorts, you need 2 80s per account to grant an 80 on the parent account if we're ONLY thinking about what it would take on the C account you would need 4 80s to equal 1 80 on account A with each 80 passing it's levels upwards c>b>a. This is rounding upwards of course you would need to do a little work on each char receiving because blizzard is stupid with the 39 grantable lvls crap witch seems totally unreasonable and is clearly an inconvenience for the sake on inconvenience.