Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 23

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    In a van, down by the river.
    Posts
    754
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I like both, and have used both at various times, But I think KC is much easier to set up.

    Having to map all those keys in Isboxer seems to take me forever, and even then, I can never figure out the broadcasting thing in the corner.

    But then again, IsBoxer has many more options also, so take it with a grain of salt, as both are excellent programs.

    Stephen
    "You cannot exaggerate about the Marines. They are convinced to the
    point of arrogance, that they are the most ferocious fighters on earth
    - and the amusing thing about it is that they are."- Father Kevin
    Keaney, Chaplain, Korean War

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F9thRet View Post
    I like both, and have used both at various times, But I think KC is much easier to set up.

    Having to map all those keys in Isboxer seems to take me forever, and even then, I can never figure out the broadcasting thing in the corner.

    But then again, IsBoxer has many more options also, so take it with a grain of salt, as both are excellent programs.

    Stephen
    Isboxer has the ability to be just as easy to set as KC by using black/white lists instead of Key Maps.

    Everything you can do in KC you can do in Isboxer. If you want to get the most out of ISboxer then using Keymaps is far more powerful but you have the choice whether to use them.

    At this point in time KCs feature set is too limiting for me. I would go with HKN (or Mojo) or Isboxer.

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •