Printable View
agreed! ;)
Ken, feel free to modify etc as you will, just please don't orphan any pages... if people don't like changes and a reversion war starts, well we can resolve that if it happens :)
BTW have a cookie for so many updates on the Wiki... and another for a.g. :)
Thanks. I won't just orphan any pages, unless they are direct copy-pasts that aren't even evaluated before posting (like the copy pasting of forum pages). The only thing I did with about 3 or 4 of pages was removing them from the front page and linking them in the introduction sections of the main pages where they belong too. There's too much on the front page and I'll think about a better system for it (and then post it here first).Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Djarid',index.php?page=Thread&postID=61925#post61 925
I absolutely want to avoid reversion wars, that's why I'm posting so much here :P
[edit] Yeay, a cookie! :9
I hope you like the new wiki frontpage. It's now more in wiki style like Wikimedia.org.
I still have to make the WoW section smaller though, so there is an even better overview.
I don't want to remove the page http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/index.php/Rigs
....but I'm asking if I can delete the content as it is meant for hardware rigs.
The current info that is on it is more something for http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/inde...%26_Where_Wiki
The current content isn't really useful, because it doesn't say much. If people want, they can add more complete info to the Who and Where Wiki link above.
I would make the Rigs page an overview of who has what kind of hardware to play what kind of game (and how many instances of the game).
Rigs is linked from http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/index.php/Hardware so that would make more sense.
sounds sensible
This page came to my attention because someone editted it today:
http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/inde...iboxing_Macros
I think we should remove it because:
- it holds almost no extra information compared to http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/index.php/Macros
- it is not properly formatted and thus mostly unreadable
It's pitty for Jafula who tried to make it more structured, but the result in the end isn't worth keeping the page in my opinion.
[edit] Jafula improved the page further, so it's not as bad as before.
Then again: is it worth copying the stickies? Isn't it better to update the regular wiki pages (and/or create new ones)?
Done:Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Djarid',index.php?page=Thread&postID=66362#post66 362
http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/index.php/Rigs