They didn't stand a chance...

[Skrimshaw]

Allow you to fight horde or alliance like Arena, then all queues will be instant.

[Ughmahedhurtz]

Allow you to fight horde or alliance like Arena, then all queues will be instant.

Oh man, rofl... Can you imagine the QQ?

"Hey, horde are jumping the barrier using a snowmound and bypassing our guards. Blizz pleeze killl dem."
"Hey, horde can cheeze our midfield towers w/o even getting shot at. Nerf plz."
"OMG WHER R OUR GUARDZ?!?"

[Yagamoth]

Before 70 It was pretty often the case, that we didn't have as much players on horde side as the alliance had. I've got a SS where I and one other player (Still single-boxing by that time ^^) capped a flag. --> 2 vs 10 on warsong. It was awesome ... He was a pvp twink rogue and I was simply a pvp addicted warlock without any level 70 chars yet. I managed to clean their flag room from their roof and get the flag to our base while to rogue made about 8 kills to defend xD

After some time more horde player joined, but we lost anyway due to the Horde:Alliance --> 1:2 when we were finally more than 5 ^^

I love to /y FOR THE HORDE when we are far less than the others.

But i rerolled on another server (still single-boxing) and had to remark, that in this realmpool it was simply the opposite. Horde > Alliance on every single bg.

Makes you wonder what the queues would look like if they changed the minimum "start" size to 80% on both sides.

Would be a nice idea. But I can see the same problem as always - "Oh, I need marks from the other bg, byebye, we would lose here anyway"

[lolzaz]

i feel bad now =p i always queue all my toons to a BG and afk all out for a free port.
D

[Kayley]

I think they need to get rid of the battlegroup concept and just have entire wow population que up.

I mean, you log into a seperate server in BGs anyway... so just massively increase the queue size.

They tried that a long time ago didn't they? I remember the 400 AV queues :P crashed a lot then they did the whole battlegroup thing.