the thread has since been locked, which is good because i could feel my braincells dying when reading the arguments there. i like how the druid acted like it wasn't all about their class mechanic and team being outdone by a new strategy - the deadly 5 shaman one we all know... then goes on to say they have no problem with boxing just in arena....proving all along it that their stance was a QQ due only to an arena loss and not an ideological or "spirit of the game" issue at all.

some of the arguments and explanations about boxing were strong. that pally had multiple posts that should have ended the thread.

Kant once said that man cannot change his or her passional feelings by thought alone. i think this applies here because you can't change someone else's view through reason. they have to have it sink in and "feel" that it's ok. no one is going to be convinced through logic, multi boxing just looks too damn amazing - you have to try it yourself to understand that balance is there in terms of challenges and rewards.

the thing that bothers me is that people will say anything - that the shaman team in question was doing shady stuff and got penalized....they will throw this stuff out there with no proof, because it doesn't exist...same poster continually edited their posts as well, likely to cover their own tracks.