Close
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Default "Hackers in Arena" thread closed promptly

    So I have taken up the habit that many here have shared with me. I now camp the various WoW Official Forums looking for chances to defend the honor of multiboxing. I ran across this thread. Now, we're not botters - we're HACKERS. I think I preferred being called a botter better. Well, maybe not. But you know what I mean...

    The OP backed off the 'HACKERS ZOMG' nonsense immediately, and then went back to the 'botting' nonsense. Belfaire took care of that one pretty quickly.

    Botting. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
    Golden. More from Belfaire.

    He's still in direct control of each account.
    Even more golden. And later...

    The software can't control the characters. He has to press a button. If you want to get into semantics, you're not controlling the character, your keyboard is.
    ZOMG!!!!111!! Exactly what we say. Will people take it seriously now that a blue spells it out? The OP says:

    If they were winning the arena tournament you wouldn't be saying this, they would get banned, because letting people do this in an es-port is laughable and any other serious game would have banned them long ago.
    Damn. Well, I can dream, can't I? Oh, and notice the old myth rearing its ugly head again - he's assuming that MBing is a new trend that no one tolerates EVER in the history of gaming.

    Oh, and as a side note, the multiboxer in question is Aelli. Of course, in an arena QQ, we would expect that by now.
    Basilikos
    Icecrown US Alliance

    Mixed Group of Unholy DeathKnight, Holy Priest, Elemental/Restoration Shaman, Arcane Mage, Balance/Restoration Druid
    Second Mixed group of Protection Paladin, Discipline Priest, Fire Mage, Affliction Warlock, Affliction Warlock

    5 Balance Druids - Shelved at 65
    Holy Priest and 4 Warlocks - Shelved at 71
    Protection Paladin and 4 Shadow Priests - Shelved at 60
    5 Elemental Shaman - Shelved at 60

  2. #2

    Default ZOMG, It got Better!

    So the OP from the thread I linked above re-posted his locked thread. The Blues chewed his ass bad.
    Basilikos
    Icecrown US Alliance

    Mixed Group of Unholy DeathKnight, Holy Priest, Elemental/Restoration Shaman, Arcane Mage, Balance/Restoration Druid
    Second Mixed group of Protection Paladin, Discipline Priest, Fire Mage, Affliction Warlock, Affliction Warlock

    5 Balance Druids - Shelved at 65
    Holy Priest and 4 Warlocks - Shelved at 71
    Protection Paladin and 4 Shadow Priests - Shelved at 60
    5 Elemental Shaman - Shelved at 60

  3. #3

    Default No one post here

    I just noticed that someone else beat me to it here. Let's let this one die off.
    Basilikos
    Icecrown US Alliance

    Mixed Group of Unholy DeathKnight, Holy Priest, Elemental/Restoration Shaman, Arcane Mage, Balance/Restoration Druid
    Second Mixed group of Protection Paladin, Discipline Priest, Fire Mage, Affliction Warlock, Affliction Warlock

    5 Balance Druids - Shelved at 65
    Holy Priest and 4 Warlocks - Shelved at 71
    Protection Paladin and 4 Shadow Priests - Shelved at 60
    5 Elemental Shaman - Shelved at 60

  4. #4

    Default

    Oh sNAP he got wrecked by two CMs. That's about as hot as it gets.

  5. #5
    Rated Arena Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    429

    Default Hackers and Cheaters

    Seems like this is happening a lot. I recently had a post calling me a cheater hit the CS forums, got 3 blue replies and locked before I even saw it Blizz seems to be on top of closing these threads before they get out of hand.
    Back to Warcraft!
    Shaggir, Shaggira, Shaggire, Shaggiri, Shaggiro - 5 Shamans US-Coilfang(H)

  6. #6

    Default

    I love it!!!
    Q u o t e:
    "Don't repost locked threads, especially with profanity. Consider your lack of suspension my gift to you."
    "Unfortunately, I'm not so forgiving, Saen.

    If we believed the practice to be against our Terms of Use we would action accordingly. What I know is a violation of our Code of Conduct is posting regarding a moderated thread. Consider this break the last warning you will likely receive on the matter."

    I bet his butt is sore after that one!
    I love the smell of electrocution in the morning!

  7. #7

    Default

    HEHEHE.. gotta LOVE GMs backing our butts up
    But most people don't have the slightest clue about boxing and how it's done.
    That's why they assume we're eiher hacking or botting, so tell them to better educate first, before jumping to conclusions!

  8. #8

    Default

    My two different styles of replies.

    Random: 'How are you doing that?' or 'Are you hacking?'
    Me: Explain who/how/where etc


    or


    Random: 'Lol hacker'
    Me: Lol idiot

    Yes calling them an idiot won't help much but making accusations without knowledge or evidence to support your claim is idiotic


  9. #9

    Default RE: Hackers and Cheaters

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Alemi',index.php?page=Thread&postID=69231#post692 31
    Seems like this is happening a lot. I recently had a post calling me a cheater hit the CS forums, got 3 blue replies and locked before I even saw it Blizz seems to be on top of closing these threads before they get out of hand.
    Customer Service is much more strictly moderated than the other forums. You can post as many multiboxing QQ threads as you want in the General Forum, but the CS forum moderators are much less patient with stupid people. And there are a lot more multiboxing QQ threads showing up in the CS forum lately, and they're all the same. It's cheating, it's unfair, it's automation, Blizzard allows it because of greed, blah blah blah. There is nothing that hasn't been covered several times just in the thread that Vyndri started, where they answered all of our questions about multiboxing. So they have become less tolerant of seeing the same thing again and again.

    And that's fine, it helps to give the Q&A thread more visits from people curious about multiboxing, and it continues to show that Blizzard is adamant about their support for multiboxing. People posting in those threads keep claiming that "more and more people will see that it's wrong" but it's the opposite effect-- more and more people see Blizzard taking and maintaining a firm stance on the issue.
    "Multibox : !! LOZERS !!" My multiboxing blog

Similar Threads

  1. Aion - closed beta start today
    By Ellay in forum General WoW Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 07-30-2009, 04:18 AM
  2. hacked and closed
    By jstanthr in forum General WoW Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-08-2009, 07:06 PM
  3. Dinged 80 yesterday, accounts closed today
    By David in forum General WoW Discussion
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 06-27-2009, 03:02 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 05:11 PM
  5. Accounts Closed due to "Billing Discrepancy"
    By Lazzadorabcd in forum General WoW Discussion
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 06-19-2008, 02:06 PM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •