SOE Reviewing Keyclone legality for EQ2

[keyclone]

you need to profile your mark better...

they're developers. throw mountain dew and hot asians



[spoiler]

[/spoiler]

[Skuggomann]

If they both split, I wouldn't blame either one of them.

That wud make me a sad panda

[mrmcgee21]

I hydra'd in everquest 1 for 6 years playing an entire team. There was no doubt I had an unfair advantage, over other players and I did use a third party program in the backround called winEQ ( see innerspace ) which basically did what the maximizer in keyclone does, did not pass keys. However I do know for sure that it was permitted, I spoke to gm's about it and pretty much everyone on my server knew of it. WinEQ still develops his software for EQ2 and many people from EQ1 continue to use it there so I'm nearly 100% sure that you will be fine. Everquest knows VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY well about boxxers. Long LONG before any of you played wow we were 6 boxxing in everquest and it was very commonly known to happen, infact probably more than 90% of that game plays 2 or more chars now due to its slow play style.

[Nisch]

This is exactly why I went the hardware route.

Even if they get after hardware boxers, then you simply bind 5 (or in my case, 6) keys next to each other on the XKeys, and just roll over them with my fingers. That will cast them at different times then. Nothing to "detect", and they're not "sync"ed. I still don't think it gives someone an unfair advantage. At least not from my perspective. I multibox in DAOC and an equally numbered group will roll me any day that's played by 6 indivudual people.

[Binaryzero]

any new leads other than using interspace for same box multiboxing? or any new ideas at all? macros? etc?

I am working on a Wizzard/Warlock combo right now but I would maybe add more...

[krum]

I had quite a rant on SOE here...