
Originally Posted by
nodoze
I am thinking of swapping to 3Mages+2Paladins from 3Warriors+2Paladins (all about level 40 right now) for Dungeon grinding at cap.
Threat tanking should be solid as the 3 Mages should not take Aggro due to having Greater Blessing of Salvation from the Paladin Healer but if they do take aggro the Tank Paladin can generate better burst AoE Threat on demand than Warrior Shouts by refreshing Greater Blessing of Kings (GBoK) on the 3 Mages (basically like a huge Shout that doesn't require you to be hit to generate Rage to be able to spam it).
Thinking of running 4Mages+Priest or 1Warlock+3Mages+Priest to catch the 3 Mages up to 40.
Would 1Warlock+3Mages+Priest be significantly slower to catch-up to 40 than 4Mages+Priest?
Would the fastest way to catch up be just running dungeons to ~40 generally avoiding bosses and focusing on XP/hour?
Edit: Still debating in my head about 2Mages+Warlock over 3Mages for the DPS core. I was originally thinking of doing PaladinTank+PaladinHealer+2Mages+Warlock but that would make the "shout-like" AoE threat only 2/3 as effective from GBoK. Lots of benefits from a Warlock (fire-shield on tank & stamina buff, stones, summons, etc) but if max efficiency of dungeon grinding is the goal maybe 3 Mages are simpler/better.
Connect With Us