I was really disappointed in that article when I looked at it, and it seems that I'm disappointed in most review sites which are doing the 2-way SLI 1080 benchmarks, and that's because they're not putting them up against any other meaningful multi-GPU benchmarks. It just doesn't make any sense.
I mean... HTF can you review a GPU in SLI when you don't put it up against any other multi-GPU competition? That just doesn't make any sense to me. TechPowerUp did a very similar thing and put up 1080 SLI against 970 SLI, which is just as weird as not putting it up against any multi-GPU benchmarks at all, but as for a bonus, they also have an aftermarket Asus GPU which they're putting up against stock cards of the prior generation. Look how much faster this overclocked, aftermarket 1080 is compared to a stock 980 Ti!
Again, I'm not saying that the 1080 isn't a nice GPU, but this all just feels like such a weird release to me because it seems like information is being hidden, or skewed. Especially when you look at nVidia's most recent jab at AMD:
NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1060-vs-Radeon-RX-480-performance-1.jpg
It's convenient that the graph starts at 0.8, but someone from the Anandtech forum fixed the graph.
There's another thread on Anandtech where people were talking about that article, and I agree with this particular post at the moment. However, I'd also assume a price tag of at least $1200 if a Titan was going to show up anytime soon.
Titan "P" for "Privilege"![]()
Connect With Us