What I meant to say is, your questions were poor. They sounded more like accusations. This puts them on the defensive and isn't constructive. I'm not trying to be a dick, but if the goal is to get answers, then you have to do everything you can to get those answers; putting the decision-makers on the defensive isn't getting us any closer to what we would consider clear resolution.

They made some good points; they want us to put in a petition and see if what we're doing is ok. The bottom line is, they're the decision makers and this is what they want; we can either get in line and conform or risk the consequences.

My proposal, then, is to produce one single video representing all of the 'tools' we as multiboxers use, and each of us can submit it to CCP on behalf of our accounts. If everyone submits the same video, we should all get the same answers (!) and then we all have the same implicit understanding of what is and isn't going to get you banned. From there we can build replicable ISBoxer functions safely.

/shrug