Close
Showing results 1 to 10 of 12

Threaded View

  1. 02-18-2015, 08:54 AM #8
    bugme143
    bugme143 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    256

    Default

    Which makes zero fucking sense, since any legal team worth their salt can draft an answer that's sufficiently binding and opaque as to prevent the rules-lawyers from trying to work around it. Sounds to me like CCP's legal team is shit and doesn't know how to add sufficient detail. James 315 wrote a massive fucking article about EXACTLY WHY CCP NEEDS TO STOP BEING MURKY WITH THEIR LINES IN THE SAND. I hate what CODE's turned into (especially knowing it's origins), but I can still agree with him.

    The TOS *is* pretty clear, if ISBoxer is banned due to 6A3, so is every other third party tool.

    E: Talk to LordsServant. He has a promise in writing from one of the CSM who arranged a meeting with CCP, might've been Falcon.
    It's not the same scenario. This is a bloody game, not fucking cancer. I am quite frankly disgusted that she even tried to bring it up and even tried to tie it into ISBoxer.
    Last edited by bugme143 : 02-18-2015 at 09:06 AM
    Wanna earn your customer's respect? Go to bat for them. Defend them and what they do. Don't roll over on command, and don't punish them for being human beings. And no, this ain't aimed at CCP.

    Keep pretending you care about EVE ISBoxers and not just their money, Lax.

    Come hang out with us in the channel "Isboxers Lounge" and discuss fittings, doctrines, or just shoot the breeze. Unlike the forums, we won't ban you for what you say. IGN: "AayJay Crendraven" and "Nolak Ataru".
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules