Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and if you feel that it’s better to have fewer stronger characters (the warlocks are higher ilevel) rather than more but weaker characters that's great. If I put the time into 5 that I did into 28 my 5 would be higher ilevel then his 5.
At some point Nalak will be down to a single very high ilevel character, but not in 5.4, what will your argument be at that point?
I would give the title of most powerful to anyone who does it faster than I did with any number of characters under their control at the same time.Would you bow down to a 100 boxing player who completes the same thing you did in a slightly shorter time?
You can name some impossible task that no one can do and set that as the standard if you wish, and that would be impressive to be sure yet because no one else has done it who can claim they are the best. If I am not the best then who is? If it’s so easy then do what I did. This argument that I am throwing money at the game might be valid if you get a free level 90 with 520 ilevel when you pay for an account but that’s not the case. I leveled up and geared up my guys within the rules and that is no small feat.Complete current raid content in a similar or faster time than an average PuG in LFR
There are two types of skill, one skill is what you do when you face the mob and the other is what you did before you faced the mob. The guy with more characters did more work and showed more skill prior to the engagement, the guy with the fewer characters (assuming same ilevel) shows more skill during the engagement.
My skill is in leveling up 28 characters to 510ish ilevel. Thus I need less skill during the encounter, even though I have the most complex macros of anyone, and am able to change them from an aoe encounter (Galleon) to a single target encounter (Nalak) within a day or two. You can claim that my macros are not the best but I show my logs, and no one else does. If you think a 3 step macro is superior to a 90 step macro then keep on believing that. And let’s not forget it’s 6 times harder to write macros for six classes then it is for one class. Also if your macros are small because you are writing fall through castsequence macros to get around something that was taken out of the game that’s kind of questionable, I am sure some would argue.
Of course my defeat of Nalak looks like it took no skill during the encounter due to the fact it didn’t, because of my extremely high skill preparation prior to the encounter. Choosing only 40 yard spells to keep me out of arc nova range, choosing the right classes years ago instead of going with the “shaman are best for boxers”, and leveling up all my guys to level 28 and 510 ilevel, gearing and gemming and chanting them all and making the gold ligit to do it with.
Does it take more skill to level up 5 characters to ilevel 540 or 28 characters to ilevel 510?
I started wow in 2008 and it was not until 5.4 did I claim to be the best, that’s a very long time.
You do realize that every time you press a single key that sends a command to two accounts at the same time from that single key press, in an mmo, you are relying upon MY ingenuity given that I am the person who invented the concept in the first place ……“skill and ingenuity”.
Due to the fact it’s been a long time now with no links I can only assume that the first two of Hayaz list do not actually exist. Thus we are down to me and the 5X warlock. If you think that a guy who does something in 9 minutes is more powerful than someone who does that same in 5.6 minutes then that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. Also he has not done galleon.
Connect With Us