Follow In Battlegrounds Broken After 5.2

[Lyonheart]

No, you look like the fool with the ridiculous threat of legal action over something trivial. Blizzard doesn't owe you anything in this regard. People quit and unsub all the time because features are removed or class abilities are changed but this whole /we're special because we pay for multiple accounts so we could pursue legal action/ is pitiful. I couldn't imagine a... warrior that unsubbed due to class nerfs threatening legal action.

We all took a risk doing this, investing time and money into a completely unsupported and (barely) tolerated style of play for which the game was not even designed.

It'd be really nice if those of you still crying about this change would give it up already, quit posting nonsense here and on the wow forums, and move on. The player base likes to imagine the multiboxing community as one person or one type of person and the few of us still doing it and enjoying it would really appreciate it if you just up and left and stopped making the rest of us look bad.

Again an idiot who does not read the entirety of my post.. i never threatened anything. I was simply voicing how i feel about it.. did I ever say i was going to take them to court?

[Ughmahedhurtz]

No, you look like the fool with the ridiculous threat of legal action over something trivial. Blizzard doesn't owe you anything in this regard. People quit and unsub all the time because features are removed or class abilities are changed but this whole /we're special because we pay for multiple accounts so we could pursue legal action/ is pitiful. I couldn't imagine a... warrior that unsubbed due to class nerfs threatening legal action.

I think you just proved his point.

[flux1]

Disabling auto follow in Battle Grounds has only hurt the multi boxer.
The problem is when multi boxers are having fun in PvP, everyone else often is not.

https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler/sta...96622594125824

I haven't checked the site in a few days so just now saw this. I'm not surprised as a few people guessed they knew it wouldn't stop bots all along. I guess his mage encountered a 5+boxer in AV and he "stopped having fun".

[Palee]

I guess one of us was unlucky and [beat up] GC in a few BGs and then he had an AH-HA moment and said to himself "This is it, I'm not having fun, this is UNFAIR, let's ban multi-boxing". But didn't for one moment think to compare it with pugs vs premades, which is exactly the same thing like pugs vs boxers, except that premades are a LOT more effective.

[Asterix]

as GC (nearly) clearly said: when MBs are having fun in PVP the others cry, that's why we removed the /follow in the BGs.

Anyone ever thought about the idea that if MBs stay out of the BGs now and do PVP at the actual quest hubs
the players will cry again on the forums and blizzard might think about removing the whole /follow command?

[luxlunae]

as GC (nearly) clearly said: when MBs are having fun in PVP the others cry, that's why we removed the /follow in the BGs.

Anyone ever thought about the idea that if MBs stay out of the BGs now and do PVP at the actual quest hubs
the players will cry again on the forums and blizzard might think about removing the whole /follow command?

I think that the number of multiboxers interested in doing that is very low.

[ebony]

as GC (nearly) clearly said: when MBs are having fun in PVP the others cry, that's why we removed the /follow in the BGs.

Anyone ever thought about the idea that if MBs stay out of the BGs now and do PVP at the actual quest hubs
the players will cry again on the forums and blizzard might think about removing the whole /follow command?

they still gave us follow back in arena they just if they wonted us out off anything then it was just random play.

[heyaz]

I think that the number of multiboxers interested in doing that is very low.

Agree. Whether they're interested or not though, I don't think there are any multiboxers even capable of doing that [causing enough trouble] anyway - at least anywhere where it would matter - like Shrine, Halfhill, Org/SW, Nalak. Even if someone were really bent on camping somewhere indefinitely that might be possible - like Duskwood or something, and pulled it off on some low-pop CRZ, I'm not sure which would happen first - them losing interest or a GM simply porting them out and suspending them for griefing.

[zzzzzzz1]

The People That Are Complaing in Blizzard It Shouldnt Matter We The Ones Paying are Game And Besides In This Age Anyone Can multibox But They Dont Want To So Its There Problem All I Know Im Having Funing 1 Shooting Them

[Fat Tire]

The People That Are Complaing in Blizzard It Shouldnt Matter We The Ones Paying are Game And Besides In This Age Anyone Can multibox But They Dont Want To So Its There Problem All I Know Im Having Funing 1 Shooting Them