GPU: GTW 670 vs 7970?

[redmosez]

Ended up going with the GTX670 4g, I also kind of had an impulsive splurge and ended up updating my entire rig =/

running with extreme4 mobo, i7 3770k, 32 G of Ram, 250 gig SDD and 1T HDD

the upgrade has been great, now that I've upgraded I think I might give 5 boxing a shot.

[MadMilitia]

I'm curious as to how 5 boxing performance is with the 680 GTX in MoP. Is it a huge jump over the 460 GTX? I mean in 5 boxing terms will you see a difference?

CPU: I7 - 2600K @ 3.4GHZ
RAM: 16 GB DDR3
GPU: 460 GTX * 2
OS: WIN7 Ultimate SP1
Software: IsBoxer, InnerSpace
Layout: 1920x1080 (main), 1370 x 768 (slaves)

[Ualaa]

I don't think you'll have a bottleneck on medium to high settings.

The processor is good, and you can overclock conservatively if you want more performance out of it.
My i7-2600K went to 4.5GHz on air, very easily.

16GB is a massive amount of Ram for 5-boxing.

A GTX 680 is a little more powerful than my GTX 670.



Aside from Ultra/DX11, your system would be quite good.

My processor hit 60% and the video card was at 80% on GPU-Z (and used 3.6GB of 4GB), when I did a short Ultra/DX11 trial.
That was 5-boxing, with a 3930K and a GTX 670 4GB Superclocked card.
It used close to 10GB of ram, with 5x Warcraft, XSplit Broadcasting 1080p HD, 13 Firefox Tabs open, iTunes, Resource Monitor and GPU-Z going.

Shadows, Water Quality, Sun Shafts, Reflections, Spell Effects and Weather Effects are generally more video limited.
View Distance of characters and objects are generally more CPU limited.
At least in my experience.

DX9 is fewer resources than DX11.
You could reduce settings, until you reach a point where the game is smooth, if you have issues.

[MadMilitia]

I don't think you'll have a bottleneck on medium to high settings.

The processor is good, and you can overclock conservatively if you want more performance out of it.
My i7-2600K went to 4.5GHz on air, very easily.

16GB is a massive amount of Ram for 5-boxing.

A GTX 680 is a little more powerful than my GTX 670.



Aside from Ultra/DX11, your system would be quite good.

My processor hit 60% and the video card was at 80% on GPU-Z (and used 3.6GB of 4GB), when I did a short Ultra/DX11 trial.
That was 5-boxing, with a 3930K and a GTX 670 4GB Superclocked card.
It used close to 10GB of ram, with 5x Warcraft, XSplit Broadcasting 1080p HD, 13 Firefox Tabs open, iTunes, Resource Monitor and GPU-Z going.

Shadows, Water Quality, Sun Shafts, Reflections, Spell Effects and Weather Effects are generally more video limited.
View Distance of characters and objects are generally more CPU limited.
At least in my experience.

DX9 is fewer resources than DX11.
You could reduce settings, until you reach a point where the game is smooth, if you have issues.

Thanks Ualaa.

I guess the major difference here is I'm running 2 * 460 GTX, not a single 680 GTX. I know WoW doesn't benefit at all from SLI so would it be a better idea to get a 680 for rendering and one of the 460s act as PhysX dedicated?

I do notice a serious drop in FPS using a 30/15 on primary and slaves respectively when using the 'high' WoW setting. 30 (primary) drops to about 23. This is using DX9.


SLI setup is disabled and the second 460 is dedicated to PhysX.

[Ualaa]

In general, a single card is going to be better than two.
That includes cards like the 690, which are two cards on one physical board.

When boxing, the only advantage of more than one card is if you want more monitors.

Then again, SLI or Crossfire can be beneficial for non-boxed games too, if you play any of those.
Also, not sure if a PhysX card is useful for boxing or not, but it could be for other stuff so likely won't hurt.