I'm calling this one early.

[MiRai]

did you even read my complete post?

Not really. When people start talking about how OP their team or their character is at any "low level battleground" is normally when I stop reading. Anyone who has ever done PvE or PvP at the top level of any expansion should be able to tell you the following:

Burning Crusade:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 69 meant nothing compared to 70.

Wrath of the Lich King:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 79 meant nothing compared to 80.

Cataclysm:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 84 meant nothing compared to 85.

Mists of Pandaria:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 89 mean nothing compared to level 90.

That is the way it's been and that is the way it will always be.

[Lyonheart]

Not really. When people start talking about how OP their team or their character is at any "low level battleground" is normally when I stop reading. Anyone who has ever done PvE or PvP at the top level of any expansion should be able to tell you the following:

Burning Crusade:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 69 meant nothing compared to 70.

Wrath of the Lich King:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 79 meant nothing compared to 80.

Cataclysm:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 84 meant nothing compared to 85.

Mists of Pandaria:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 89 mean nothing compared to level 90.

That is the way it's been and that is the way it will always be.

You don't think I know that? My post was not claiming that because I'm doing well at lower levels..that i think the class will be viable at 90. And his post did not say he was 90. My response to his post was to clarify some facts ( more than one ranged attack ). And that there are gap closers. And to give hope to those who might still be leveling monks. I know of one monk team at 90 clearing heroics, although not PvP, shows that they atleast dont completely suck.

In short, his post was doom and gloom and might discourage future monk teams. Mine was just to offer some ideas, based on his comments, how they can be used to overcome the faults he listed ( not enough ranged,,no way to keep a mage from kiting etc.. )

Based on many other threads, here on DB.com, NO team looks to be viable at 90 in PvP..but I take all that with a grain of salt and am someone who tries to have a positive outlook.

[valkry]

Not really. When people start talking about how OP their team or their character is at any "low level battleground" is normally when I stop reading. Anyone who has ever done PvE or PvP at the top level of any expansion should be able to tell you the following:

Burning Crusade:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 69 meant nothing compared to 70.

Wrath of the Lich King:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 79 meant nothing compared to 80.

Cataclysm:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 84 meant nothing compared to 85.

Mists of Pandaria:
In terms of balance, levels 1 - 89 mean nothing compared to level 90.

That is the way it's been and that is the way it will always be.

I'll even expand on that further, 1-70 meant nothing compared to 70 fully geared, etc etc