Close
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Member JohnGabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle Washington, USA
    Posts
    2272

    Default Help me compare two motherboards

    First there is the ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z LGA 1155 Intel Z68 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 Extended ATX Intel Motherboard which costs $339 at:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131760

    Then you have the GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4-B3 LGA 1155 Intel P67 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard which costs $169 at:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128478

    They both seem the same features. Is it worth the extra $200 to get the ASUS motherboard?

  2. #2

    Default

    I have an Asus Rampage Extreme and its a board made for overclocking. If you want to overclock and have the extra money get the Asus. If not then get the gigabyte. I planned on overclocking but never did so I wasted the money on the extra features.
    “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
    Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
    Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
    Epicurus

  3. #3
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnGabriel View Post
    They both seem the same features. Is it worth the extra $200 to get the ASUS motherboard?
    The ASUS board is a very high end board. If both of those motherboards look the same to you then why not go with the
    cheaper board? Do you plan to run 3 or 4 video cards? If so, you'll need the ASUS board. The ASUS board also has many
    more USB 3.0 ports on it... are you going to utilize all of them?

    Both boards are going to overclock an unlocked processor the same up to a point. If you're looking to exceed 5GHz (which
    I don't recommend) then you may want to go with the ASUS board.
    Do not send me a PM if what you want to talk about isn't absolutely private.
    Ask your questions on the forum where others can also benefit from the information.

    Author of the almost unknown and heavily neglected blog: Multiboxology

  4. #4
    Member JohnGabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle Washington, USA
    Posts
    2272

    Default

    I wasnt planning on doing any overclocking. Just get the board/cpu/ram combo and drop it in.

    I used to do this type of stuff for a living, but the last 20 years I've been in a management position. I haven't kept up do date with the tech and everything has changed so much.

  5. #5
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnGabriel View Post
    I wasnt planning on doing any overclocking. Just get the board/cpu/ram combo and drop it in.

    I used to do this type of stuff for a living, but the last 20 years I've been in a management position. I haven't kept up do date with the tech and everything has changed so much.
    Then you should be good to go with the Gigabyte board. I would recommend a newer chipset on that board, though.
    Like this one:

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128506

    ...or this one...

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128498

    Those two boards look practically identical minus the fact that their external ports slightly vary from each other. The
    board in the second link also includes PCIe 3.0 which isn't currently being utilized and probably isn't that big of a deal.
    With the extra money you'll be saving versus the ASUS board you can practically purchase the processor.
    Do not send me a PM if what you want to talk about isn't absolutely private.
    Ask your questions on the forum where others can also benefit from the information.

    Author of the almost unknown and heavily neglected blog: Multiboxology

  6. #6
    Member JohnGabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle Washington, USA
    Posts
    2272

    Default

    Thank you, you have been more than helpful.

  7. #7
    Member jstanthr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    Posts
    334

    Default

    one of the biggest differences i see in the boards is the number of PCI-E lanes. If you think you might want to do SLI go with the asus or any other Z68 board. if your just going to run a single gfx card any p67 board will do, the gigabyte board mirai is reccomending is an awesome board, i have several boxer friends that use it. i know the p67 boards say they support SLI but when u actually use both slots they downclock to 8x if you want true 16x 16x sli you will need a z68 board. thats just my opinion
    Magtheridon US <The Zerg>
    PvE Teams (A lot funner than i expected)


    PVP-Farming teams


  8. #8
    Member JohnGabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle Washington, USA
    Posts
    2272

    Default

    Thanks everyone, this has been a fun process, simply the researching and ordering. Cant wait to actually put everything together.

    To put things in perspective as to how long its been since I've gotten my hands dirty.... My current toaster has more memory than the computers I used to work on. I doubt you can even find the CP/M operating system I used to tinker with.

    Alot has changed since I graduated college in the 1980s.

  9. #9
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jstanthr View Post
    i know the p67 boards say they support SLI but when u actually use both slots they downclock to 8x if you want true 16x 16x sli you will need a z68 board. thats just my opinion
    Z68 is just a P67 + H67 with Intel's Smart Response. Natively, both chipsets only support a single x16 lane or dual x8 lanes. The
    only way a Z68/P67 board can support more than 16 PCIe lanes is through the use of the extra NF200 chip. The difference
    between x16/x16 and x8/x8 is negligible and rarely will a normal player be able to saturate the PCIe lanes on an x8/x8 SLI setup.


    Quote Originally Posted by JohnGabriel View Post
    To put things in perspective as to how long its been since I've gotten my hands dirty.... My current toaster has more memory than the computers I used to work on. I doubt you can even find the CP/M operating system I used to tinker with.

    Alot has changed since I graduated college in the 1980s.
    You must be doing something right because my toaster has zero memory.
    Do not send me a PM if what you want to talk about isn't absolutely private.
    Ask your questions on the forum where others can also benefit from the information.

    Author of the almost unknown and heavily neglected blog: Multiboxology

  10. #10
    Member JohnGabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle Washington, USA
    Posts
    2272

    Default

    For multiboxing its best to use a single graphic card right? Is SLI primarily for games running full screen?

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •