ISBoxer is superior but...

[traedoril]

So, I posted a couple of days ago that I use GCP (www.gamecommanderpro.com) and that I really liked the software. Everyone told me to try ISBoxer because it is superior software. I have only used it for a total of a day and I have to say its far better in every way.

Now for the but. I was reading in Mercurio's post about setting up a "2 Step Toggle". I currently just bind my 2 dps sequences to 2 and 3 and pretty much alternate hitting them the entire time. 2 being a general castsequence and 3 being proc based attacks. I would like to just be able to spam "2" and do both so that I can use 3 for a different macro I do not however understand his explanation of setting it up. When I type in "2 step" as the target key I get a <NO KEY MAPPED> in the action. What did I do wrong?

[Ughmahedhurtz]

You have to create the action first, then select which mapped key you want it to perform, which window or ATG it targets, etc. This is pretty much the same way all actions work in ISBoxer.

See if this thread helps you any: http://isboxer.com/index.php/guides/...t-2-step-macro

[traedoril]

Ok That make much more sense. One other question while I am at it. My team consists of Prot pally, Boomkin, Combat Rogue and an Arcane mage. I set up a stop follow key for the boomkin and the mage but whenever my rogue attacks something he stops following my paladin and isn't always in range of the next mob attacking me. How do I make a key that tells my rogue to follow me when I press it. Or is there a better way to make sure the rogue stays in range of whatever we are attacking, I was in Sunken Temple and all the dragons have a knock back I eventually had to click my rogues screen and keep moving him into range because of the constant knockback effects.

[Ughmahedhurtz]

Are you using Click-to-move and Interact With Target keys on your rogue? If not, that's the easiest way by far.

See if the links in this thread help: http://www.dual-boxing.com/showthread.php?t=45693

[MiRai]

You're asking support questions in the general forum (which isn't for support) and the title of the thread doesn't exactly match
your new set(s) of questions. Certain people here browse certain sub-forums and can answer these questions if they had
better exposure rather than this thread and its mystery title. Someone that answers questions in the actual support forum
might not come across this thread for several days (or they might not see it at all) because they don't care what's going on in
the general forum.

In the future, I would urge you to make new, specific threads rather than compounding numerous questions that do not
pertain to each other in a single thread. I say this for (at least) two reasons:

1. Everyone knows what they're about to read when they see the title of the thread.
2. New users searching for specific things (such as CTM and IWT) can find threads easier if they're labeled correctly.

I (and others here) do not mind answering questions but, keeping things nice and tidy around here makes it much easier to
find the needed information.

[traedoril]

Ah I am very sorry a moderator can move this to the support forum.

[MiRai]

Ah I am very sorry a moderator can move this to the support forum.

I would have moved it but I didn't know where to put it because I can't split it up -- I was just saying for future reference.
It just helps you get the answers you need and it helps new people find the answers they're looking for.