New RAF Option Proposal

[Oatboat]

You'd be surprised at how far a money making suggestion will go. I'm sure it will factor down to the "can we do this?" and "How much does it cost us compared to how much can we make?"

I'd like it.. especially if it went to 80 like the new RAF does.

[Svpernova09]

You'd be surprised at how far a money making suggestion will go. I'm sure it will factor down to the "can we do this?" and "How much does it cost us compared to how much can we make?"

I'd like it.. especially if it went to 80 like the new RAF does.

I think the only limitation would be the technical aspect of toggling RAF status of an account off and on. We already know they can do it for *new* accounts.

[Oatboat]

Yeah, man hours costs compared to incoming gains.

Either way... its still a good idea

[Crum1515]

I love this idea, and support it.

I would even say get them to give the option to pay for a "premium" subscription that rolls in the remote AH and guild chat, RaF and all that good jazz and make subs like 20.99$, and then offer all them seperately for people that dont want it all

[Vecter]

I have posted the thread:

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/3278809656#1

Please keep boxing out of the discussion for now, like MiRai said we don't need this getting completely derailed as it will have a hard enough time as it is.

[Crum1515]

I am so damn surprised at the responses that this thread has gotten (the thread on wow). i would like to see more though, i think for blizz to take a genuine interest it needs more post and bumps, and perhaps a blue... but all in all its a great idea. Vecter, you should pop in and add a reply in reinforcing peoples support and/or answering the dumb questions (like the guy asking 20$ total or more) just to keep the thread visible. I would... but i have no active accounts

[Knytestorme]

I'm not sure what I feel about this tbh. I'm not going to say I disagree with it as I'm sure there are reasons for it but quite honestly I don't see how anyone ever has issues leveling as many teams as they want during the RAF period, even with a heavy workload.

I worked ~45 hours a week during my RAF challenge and have posted what I got done in just 2 months of RAF. I'm sure for those with kids it would be slightly harder but I would have thought it would be someone like Sam posting for something like this as opposed to someone that knows what they are doing and talking about.

[daanji]

When I did RAF it was 2 years ago and it only went to 60.

Even so, I only got 3 teams done. I was working 60 hour weeks, no kids, wife, and I sometimes I do other stuff and may not log in every day or couple of days.


I really wish I could RAF my existing accounts.
Suppose I could start over with 5 new accounts and level 10 teams to 81 like you did...but I'm pretty sure I'd stab myself first.

[Khatovar]

I'm not sure what I feel about this tbh. I'm not going to say I disagree with it as I'm sure there are reasons for it but quite honestly I don't see how anyone ever has issues leveling as many teams as they want during the RAF period, even with a heavy workload.

From a non-multiboxer point of view, like I said in my first post, friends and family who quit might be more inclined to come back if they could get RAF again just to catch up to other people without having to get a new account. Especially if they'd already leveled up a bit or spent the time and money to level up professions or gotten some hard-to-get achievements. People like that might not have access to things like heirlooms, making leveling even less appealing.

[Machoclown]

Great Idea!!! (my RAF ended yesterday..... )