Close
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Upgrade choice

  1. #1

    Default Upgrade choice

    Currently rolling with an i7-930 and 12Gb RAM but feel the urge to change things up after tax return (will be replacing the 460's with 3Gb 580's)

    Choices are to keep current mobo and get an i7-970 and 24Gb RAM or to switch to a 2600K with new mobo + 16Gb RAM. Both options will cost pretty much the same so it's more about getting the most effective option for the next 2 years.

    Main uses are development (Vis Studio/Dreamweaver/SQL Server for app and web dev), VM's for servers/testing, audio work (DAW), online poker and WoW.

    My current thinking is that more cores + ram is likely better for my situation then extra speed but I haven't had a chance to play with Sandy Bridge yet so not sure if it will actually bring more to the table then just a faster clock speed.

  2. #2
    Member Ughmahedhurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North of The Wall, South of The Line
    Posts
    7169

    Default

    Personally, I'd go with the 2600K option. Fenril's testing has shown that this CPU is a beast for boxing applications. You can always add more RAM later.
    Now playing: WoW (Garona)

  3. #3

    Default

    Dump both options, go with a dual-hex setup with 48GB ram.

    least that's my plan when I return to the states.
    Hardware Lurker

  4. #4

    Default

    Wait for the sandy bridge e release. The current 2600k is a great chip but the chipsets are not as powerful as the X58 currently. The update for this is due end of this year. Will have quad channel memory instead of tri channel with up to 40 PCI Express lanes for multi GPU goodness (I am assuming from the plural of 460s that you are looking at MultiGPU). If you really want something now then I would say go the 2600k direction as you mention the most effective option fo the next few years and hopefully the sandy bridge chipsets will accept a CPU upgrade or two if you so choose.

  5. #5

    Default

    I'd go with a i7 980/990 and keep the triple channel memory that you have, no point downgrading to a sandy bridge chip.

  6. #6
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sajuuk View Post
    Dump both options, go with a dual-hex setup with 48GB ram.

    least that's my plan when I return to the states.
    Sam can help you build that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Noids View Post
    Wait for the sandy bridge e release. The current 2600k is a great chip but the chipsets are not as powerful as the X58 currently. The update for this is due end of this year. Will have quad channel memory instead of tri channel with up to 40 PCI Express lanes for multi GPU goodness (I am assuming from the plural of 460s that you are looking at MultiGPU).
    What makes you say that 1155 is not as powerful as X58? I'm also curious as to what benefits more PCIe lanes
    and quad channel memory will provide to people over what we currently have. Real world benefits not the idea
    that more is better.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kekkerer View Post
    I'd go with a i7 980/990 and keep the triple channel memory that you have, no point downgrading to a sandy bridge chip.
    I do believe you need to look at a few benchmarks before you tell someone to upgrade to an outdated
    processor which costs $1,000.

  7. #7

    Default

    Agreeing with Fenril, I have the 980x chip... Wish I would have waited a lil longer for the 2600k. The benchmarks say it all, and now I'm stuck with a $1k chip until my next upgrade/build in a couple years.

  8. #8
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Umbaalo View Post
    Agreeing with Fenril, I have the 980x chip... Wish I would have waited a lil longer for the 2600k. The benchmarks say it all, and now I'm stuck with a $1k chip until my next upgrade/build in a couple years.
    The 980/990 is definitely a nice chip and I'm not knocking it, but to recommend it at this stage of the X58 and
    1155 chipsets is slightly amiss. I almost went the 980X route back in November but decided not to and see
    what Sandy Bridge had to offer. I actually was trying to hold out for LGA2011 but after seeing Sandy Bridge
    benchmarks I just couldn't wait any longer.

  9. #9

    Default

    6 physical cores are ideal for multiboxing 5 accounts because there is a high level of parallelisation and significant memory access.

    The OP, already has a 1366 motherboard and DDR3 ram therefore getting a new motherboard, cpu and memory may not even be cheaper.

    Edit: a lot of benchmarks are not designed to take into account multithreaded jobs which is what multiboxing is. Multiboxing has a similar load distribution to video editing, though this is my opinion.
    Last edited by Kekkerer : 06-25-2011 at 02:15 PM

  10. #10
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kekkerer View Post
    6 physical cores are ideal for multiboxing 5 accounts because there is a high level of parallelisation and significant memory access.
    I don't know what that means.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kekkerer View Post
    The OP, already has a 1366 motherboard and DDR3 ram therefore getting a new motherboard, cpu and memory may not even be cheaper.
    The 2600K processor, which costs $320, is the most expensive item of the three which would need to be
    purchased. As for whether he believes he currently has poor performance or not with his X58 i7 is for him to
    decide. I believe he would be able to stick it out until Ivy Bridge is released, though.

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •