Blue Post against Complainer about Multiboxing

[Ughmahedhurtz]

At least the blue post hit it on the head that we can't take evasive action as well as individual players ....

It's funny, though, how you have basically three standard arguments from the multiboxing haters:

1. Blizzard is making too much money from it to ban it.
2. They're impossible to kill.
3. They're easy to kill: just kill the lead guy and they all stop.

1 = "...vanishingly small minority that multibox..." = INVALID
2 = Obviously not, or multiboxers would be topping all the arena ratings. = INVALID
3 = Unless you're using any FTL-type setup where leader swaps are either instant or fairly quick and painless. = INVALID

The first two are so stupidly obvious as to be unworthy of rebuttal. The third is obviously false, but I'm OK with letting them stew in their own ignorance.

Regardless, anti-boxers are so completely irrational in their arguments that it defies belief.

[ebony]

It's funny, though, how you have basically three standard arguments from the multiboxing haters:

1. Blizzard is making too much money from it to ban it.
2. They're impossible to kill.
3. They're easy to kill: just kill the lead guy and they all stop.

1 = "...vanishingly small minority that multibox..." = INVALID
2 = Obviously not, or multiboxers would be topping all the arena ratings. = INVALID
3 = Unless you're using any FTL-type setup where leader swaps are either instant or fairly quick and painless. = INVALID

The first two are so stupidly obvious as to be unworthy of rebuttal. The third is obviously false, but I'm OK with letting them stew in their own ignorance.

Regardless, anti-boxers are so completely irrational in their arguments that it defies belief.

i posted this on the topic i like it (hope u do not mind)

[MiRai]

It's funny, though, how you have basically three standard arguments from the multiboxing haters:

1. Blizzard is making too much money from it to ban it.
2. They're impossible to kill.
3. They're easy to kill: just kill the lead guy and they all stop.

1 = "...vanishingly small minority that multibox..." = INVALID
2 = Obviously not, or multiboxers would be topping all the arena ratings. = INVALID
3 = Unless you're using any FTL-type setup where leader swaps are either instant or fairly quick and painless. = INVALID

The first two are so stupidly obvious as to be unworthy of rebuttal. The third is obviously false, but I'm OK with letting them stew in their own ignorance.

Regardless, anti-boxers are so completely irrational in their arguments that it defies belief.

i posted this on the topic i like it (hope u do not mind)

More of our secrets! Keep the uninformed uninformed.