I'm bored at the office, so I've broken my "stay silent" mentallity and have been replying to all the multiboxing threads on Rift Forums![]()
I'm bored at the office, so I've broken my "stay silent" mentallity and have been replying to all the multiboxing threads on Rift Forums![]()
"For God's sake, don't stand there at 30 yards trying to cast a spell, he will melt your face period."
Lokked
Heh. He starts with "you've got the gameplay of one person netting the benefits of several" and ends with "multiboxing a healer to follow you around (or bard, whatever) or have waiting somewhere to buff/heal/storage you, is a different thing entirely to me."
So within a few sentences, he goes from 'it's not fair for one person to get the benefits of several people' to 'on the other hand, I don't mind when one person gets the benefits of several people.' I think we can safely file that one in the "idiot" category and move on to the next crybaby.
"Multibox : !! LOZERS !!" My multiboxing blog
Yeah, I could kind of see his point of view until he added that end note.
I guess multiboxing one guy to heal and buff you is OK, but five is crazy. (becasue he can only afford two accounts, maybe?)
If multiples is what makes things more "illegal", I hope he never sees me (with 10) or heaven forbid Sam![]()
10-boxing Alliance Sargeras and Kil'jaeden
I tried to add a civil reply, we'll see how it goes.
BTW the post is under Naxalar, not sure what I was thinking.
Connect With Us