Quote Originally Posted by Crayonbox View Post
khatovar beat me to it.

I've played a warrior MT for almost 5 years in WoW and I played a Cleric in EQ for almost 6. Through all that I've been boxing and when I started to heavily multibox in WoW, I went to pally tank because of its ease. I personally find warriors to be more entertaining to play solo, but for boxing, nothing really beats how easy it is to tank with a pally :P

*btw, my guild paladin tanks cried foul when I told them the reason I was using a pally tank for my teams. They though I was doing it because I finally realized that pally tanks were "better" pfft~ i say! :P

Im glad u and khat replied

I think after reading for hours on end im seeing that pales are just easier to box as a tank it seems

But i a have had such a blast on this warrior so far I'm going to level him solo when I'm on the road with my laptop

And use a pally for tanking boxing team ... Although i may switch them back and forth to see how much mire demanding the reactive would be using a warrior ...


But don't the extra buffs you get from pally really give them an edge when choosing a tank as well ... Or am i reading to much into the pales buffs and spells they bring to table in addition to tanking