Macro for Ret Pally?

[TeamGrizzly]

Anyone have a one/two buttons spammable macro for Ret pally? I tried the following but dps with a item lvl 270+ 2H sword is lower than my prot spec dps holding a item lvl 200 1H sword..

Button 1:
/castsequence reset=combat
Judgement,
Crusader Strike,
Crusader Strike,
Judgement,
Divine Storm,
Crusader Strike,
Crusader Strike,
Divine Storm,
Holy Wrath,

Button 2:
/cast Hammer of Wrath

[Aragent]

Anyone have a one/two buttons spammable macro for Ret pally? I tried the following but dps with a item lvl 270+ 2H sword is lower than my prot spec dps holding a item lvl 200 1H sword..

Button 1:
/castsequence reset=combat
Judgement,
Crusader Strike,
Crusader Strike,
Judgement,
Divine Storm,
Crusader Strike,
Crusader Strike,
Divine Storm,
Holy Wrath,

Button 2:
/cast Hammer of Wrath

Macros Ive been working on for my project can be found (all post 4.0.1 and up) http://www.dual-boxing.com/showthread.php?t=33080
You might have to strip off the conditionals if your not using the setup or Isboxer (I produced the below example for Ret Pally.

Button 1:
/castsequence reset=combat/ctrl Holy Wrath,Crusader Strike,Judgement,Exorcism,Crusader Strike,Templar's Verdict,Judgement,Crusader Strike,Exorcism,Crusader Strike,Judgement,Templar's Verdict
/use 13
/use 14

Button 2:
/stopcasting
/castsequence exorcism
/stopcasting
/cast Hammer of Wrath
/cast Avenging Wrath

[Ughmahedhurtz]

Did we really need another thread on this?

Here, I think I can help some more: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Adual-box...ar%27s+verdict

[remanz]

Those are level 80 macros.

They don't work for 81+. At level 81 you get inquisition + 30% holy damage for 10 second, for each holy power. It is kind of like slice and dice for paladins. I didn't find a good way to fit it in yet. But without inquisition, retardin is not doing on par damage, lags behind other melees. Have to keep it up at all times.

[Ughmahedhurtz]

Those are level 80 macros.

They don't work for 81+. At level 81 you get inquisition + 30% holy damage for 10 second, for each holy power. It is kind of like slice and dice for paladins. I didn't find a good way to fit it in yet. But without inquisition, retardin is not doing on par damage, lags behind other melees. Have to keep it up at all times.

I hate to sound like a prick, but please re-read the original post.

Anyone have a one/two buttons spammable macro for Ret pally? I tried the following but dps with a item lvl 270+ 2H sword is lower than my prot spec dps holding a item lvl 200 1H sword..

We're talking about someone who is obviously struggling with DPS even with current macros. If your ret(s) with i270(heroic) weap(s) are pulling lower DPS than your protadin who is wearing an i200 weapon, you're Doing It Wrong(tm) and obviously haven't even bothered to read anything posted so far. The threads I posted have verified _working_ macros that get my rets up to about 4k in crap gear and rets in good gear up to about 6k. It's a good, proven, valid starting point considering the OP's question.

Also note that the OP did not discuss inquisition anywhere in his post. Thus, the valid conclusion that we're not talking about 81+ macros with Inquisition involved. That information would, regardless, have been better discussed as an addition to the linked informative threads rather than starting a completely new thread with zero new information.

http://www.signingsavvy.com/sign/UNDERSTAND/715/1

[remanz]

I hate to sound like a prick, but please re-read the original post.



We're talking about someone who is obviously struggling with DPS even with current macros. If your ret(s) with i270(heroic) weap(s) are pulling lower DPS than your protadin who is wearing an i200 weapon, you're Doing It Wrong(tm) and obviously haven't even bothered to read anything posted so far. The threads I posted have verified _working_ macros that get my rets up to about 4k in crap gear and rets in good gear up to about 6k. It's a good, proven, valid starting point considering the OP's question.

Also note that the OP did not discuss inquisition anywhere in his post. Thus, the valid conclusion that we're not talking about 81+ macros with Inquisition involved. That information would, regardless, have been better discussed as an addition to the linked informative threads rather than starting a completely new thread with zero new information.

http://www.signingsavvy.com/sign/UNDERSTAND/715/1

No argument there. Your points are valid. Too much wipe in cata instances, i am starting to talk to myself

[Ughmahedhurtz]

No argument there. Your points are valid. Too much wipe in cata instances, i am starting to talk to myself

Apologies if I came across as gruff. I was dealing with some idiots at work at the time and was about to throw something.