The Final Countdown OOOHHH!

[Pandamonium]

Thanks.

Using:

          /----->--C----->--F
Account A|------->B
          \----->--D----->--E

I am confused as to B's role in all of this.

Opps, I was in a hurry and forgot to preview it, also I'm apparently retarded at making charts (the spaces magically disappear)

This is what I meant:
Account A (existing), links to account B, C and D are linked to B, E is linked to D, and F is linked to C

[MiRai]

Opps, I was in a hurry and forgot to preview it, also I'm apparently retarded at making charts (the spaces magically disappear)

This is what I meant:
Account A (existing), links to account B, C and D are linked to B, E is linked to D, and F is linked to C

So in other words...

A will be boosting CDEF and when you've got your teams at 60 you're going to use C/D's grantable levels to give to B so it can be on par with CDEF level-wise?

[Pandamonium]

Yep, exactly

[Sam DeathWalker]

Yur Method:

4 X 60

gives 5 level 60's


My Method:

2 X 30
2 X 60

gives 5 level 60's my method will cost an extra transfer though, and my method leaves a level 60 on the original account (but only need 4 new accounts).

[Owltoid]

Yur Method:

4 X 60

gives 5 level 60's


My Method:

2 X 30
2 X 60

gives 5 level 60's my method will cost an extra transfer though, and my method leaves a level 60 on the original account (but only need 4 new accounts).

Lol at "My Method". Didn't this forum try to convince you for around 6 months to do this method before you finally abandoned your old way and listened to good advice? I'm agreeing the method you posted is a good one, it's just funny that you didn't listen to everyone for a looooong time.

[Zub]

Opps, I was in a hurry and forgot to preview it, also I'm apparently retarded at making charts (the spaces magically disappear)

        /----->--C----->--F
Account A|------->B
        \----->--D----->--E

This is what I meant:
Account A (existing), links to account B, C and D are linked to B, E is linked to D, and F is linked to C

so i guess the correct chart is

                   /----->--C----->--F
Account A|------->B
                   \----->--D----->--E

I'm still confused as why there is a B, and not C and D linked to A directly (and therefore pay for 5 accounts only instead of 6)
I assume it's to make sure that C and D still get triple xp even though they are in the same group as a linked high level (booster on A), but wouldn't they get that from being grouped with E and F anyway?

And in the end, when C and D have a 60 you can grant a toon to 60 on account A, where you already have a 76 and 70.
And if you level quickly a toon on A to 30, then you can grant him to 60 with the remaining grantable levels (E->D (30) => D->A (15) + F->C(30) => C->A (15) ) for a total of 30 levels

Not sure, but that's my understanding anyway.

[Maxion]

so i guess the correct chart is

                   /----->--C----->--F
Account A|------->B
                   \----->--D----->--E

I'm still confused as why there is a B, and not C and D linked to A directly (and therefore pay for 5 accounts only instead of 6)
I assume it's to make sure that C and D still get triple xp even though they are in the same group as a linked high level (booster on A), but wouldn't they get that from being grouped with E and F anyway?

And in the end, when C and D have a 60 you can grant a toon to 60 on account A, where you already have a 76 and 70.
And if you level quickly a toon on A to 30, then you can grant him to 60 with the remaining grantable levels (E->D (30) => D->A (15) + F->C(30) => C->A (15) ) for a total of 30 levels

Not sure, but that's my understanding anyway.

Last time I checked, even if you are grouped with a linked account of the same level, you don't get triple xp if you are also grouped with a linked account with a high level booster.

I.e. if you link a>b>c>d>e>f and use a to boost, b won't get triple xp because of being linked to the high level a.

Maybe they changed it I dunno.

[uffela]

Last time I checked, even if you are grouped with a linked account of the same level, you don't get triple xp if you are also grouped with a linked account with a high level booster.

I.e. if you link a>b>c>d>e>f and use a to boost, b won't get triple xp because of being linked to the high level a.

Maybe they changed it I dunno.

I get the same amount of XP on BCDE when boosting with A. But I can't promise that it's 300% that they get. I'll check that, currently at 40 with my next team.

Anyone aware of an addon that can separate the RAF XP from total XP?

[Zub]

I get the same amount of XP on BCDE when boosting with A. But I can't promise that it's 300% that they get. I'll check that, currently at 40 with my next team.

Anyone aware of an addon that can separate the RAF XP from total XP?

the combat log should tell you similar to :

you receive 494 xp (+333 recruit-a-friend, +50 group xp)

[MiRai]

So in other words...

A will be boosting CDEF and when you've got your teams at 60 you're going to use C/D's grantable levels to give to B so it can be on par with CDEF level-wise?

Yep, exactly

So then what happens to A after everything is said and done?

Last time I checked, even if you are grouped with a linked account of the same level, you don't get triple xp if you are also grouped with a linked account with a high level booster.

I.e. if you link a>b>c>d>e>f and use a to boost, b won't get triple xp because of being linked to the high level a.

Maybe they changed it I dunno.

When I did my last RaF in Oct/Nov through January I was linked A>B>C>D>E and A was my boosting 80. Everyone was getting triple XP. I even have proof of this in my YouTube videos [with my god awful UI at the time].