My understanding of the problem that people are referring to (which is based on what I've read, not personal experience - keep that in mind), is that by having two monitors of the same size, you can have your video card span the two as a single virtual desktop, rather than having XP deal with the two monitors. It is apparently that part of XP (dealing with multiple monitors) that is inefficient.Originally Posted by 'Mac',index.php?page=Thread&postID=32510#post32510
Vista is supposed to have fixed that to some degree, but it brings other multihead issues to the table of its own, so it's a bit of a ?( whether or not it will work well.
At least that's my understanding. Maybe somebody with personal experience will chime in.
Connect With Us