Against the rules?

[Owltoid]

If you feel uncertain about the use of certain functions in ISboxer/IS then don't use em - without being harsh towards your post.

Theres a lot of discussions around some of the functionalities in ISboxer on this forum - like the option to receive a keypress on both the down press and on the release of a button....

I understand you're not trying to be harsh towards the post However, I'm not sure what your point is. The multiboxing community is largely self regulated as most of us have a passion for playing the game within the rules. There are plenty of ways that we could bot using ISBoxer, HKN, etc, but as a community we tend to stay away from anything that would cast us in that light. With that in mind, I brought up the point of having the software do something that can not be replicated using just WoW (key up and key down can be replicated in WoW) and seems awfuly close to delays.

Whether it's against the rules or not, I'll have to make a personal choice on if to use the functionality. I'm not asking the community if I should use it or not, I'm asking if they think it's against the rules or not.

[Svpernova09]

I understand you're not trying to be harsh towards the post However, I'm not sure what your point is. The multiboxing community is largely self regulated as most of us have a passion for playing the game within the rules. There are plenty of ways that we could bot using ISBoxer, HKN, etc, but as a community we tend to stay away from anything that would cast us in that light. With that in mind, I brought up the point of having the software do something that can not be replicated using just WoW (key up and key down can be replicated in WoW) and seems awfuly close to delays.

Whether it's against the rules or not, I'll have to make a personal choice on if to use the functionality. I'm not asking the community if I should use it or not, I'm asking if they think it's against the rules or not.

The problem with this is, mostly, the multiboxing community is wrong in their understanding of the rules. Which is why people seem to cry wolf so fast. Blizzard wants to make sure you are there playing the game and not harassing others, past that, they've proven (by not taking action) they really don't care what else goes on. You can achieve similar things with Nostromo software, and I assume the G15 and other similar software. So if you're asking the community if they think having a keymap reset after X seconds from the FIRST press is against the rules, I as a member of the community, respond with a resounding No. Am I an expert on what is allowed and what is not? By no means I am not. But this functionality still requires you be PRESENT at the keyboard and PUSHING BUTTONS to accomplish something.

[thefunk]

PUSHING BUTTONS

Svper I prefer the term MASHING...

[Owltoid]

The problem with this is, mostly, the multiboxing community is wrong in their understanding of the rules. Which is why people seem to cry wolf so fast. Blizzard wants to make sure you are there playing the game and not harassing others, past that, they've proven (by not taking action) they really don't care what else goes on. You can achieve similar things with Nostromo software, and I assume the G15 and other similar software. So if you're asking the community if they think having a keymap reset after X seconds from the FIRST press is against the rules, I as a member of the community, respond with a resounding No. Am I an expert on what is allowed and what is not? By no means I am not. But this functionality still requires you be PRESENT at the keyboard and PUSHING BUTTONS to accomplish something.

Would you have a problem with pushing a button once, having it send the number 1 to WoW, waiting two seconds, and then sending the number 2 to WoW?

I'm not trolling and not trying to start a heated conversation but instead trying to get the common viewpoint on when software intelligence goes too far. If people want to play with delays then more power to them, but that doesn't stop the conversation of whether it's legit or not

And I disagree with the multiboxing community being wrong with their interpretation of the rules... if you have any examples I'd love to hear them!

[Svpernova09]

Would you have a problem with pushing a button once, having it send the number 1 to WoW, waiting two seconds, and then sending the number 2 to WoW?

Now you're making stuff up to argue? No, pushing a button once, waiting, and sending another button (or the same) would constitute a delay, delays being against the rules. This is NOT what your original post described. What your original post described (Keymap resetting after X seconds) is NOT a delay. You still have to PUSH or MASH the buttons for an action to happen. The only thing that gets changed during the button mashing is the keys that are sent. it does not send any keys without you telling it to.

I'm not trolling and not trying to start a heated conversation but instead trying to get the common viewpoint on when software intelligence goes too far. If people want to play with delays then more power to them, but that doesn't stop the conversation of whether it's legit or not

And I disagree with the multiboxing community being wrong with their interpretation of the rules... if you have any examples I'd love to hear them!

People aren't playing with delays with ISBoxer (If they are, they're doing it outside of IS/ISBoxer. When you start a "Against the rules?" Thread, you're going to get these kinds of responses :_) I understand you have a legitimate concern, but I think that you're thinking more is happening than what actually is. As I said above, there are no programmed delays in the Keymap reset.

An example of the general multiboxing community being wrong in their interpretation is the 1 key to 1 action rule. It's been proven time and time again to not be the case. GMs have confirmed multiple actions in 1 keystrokes are fine. (Kromtor got a GM response about a G15 macro that sends more than 1 key) But I'm not here to debate that in this thread. I'm just trying to explain that ISBoxer is fine, and I don't like fear mongering "AGAINST THE RULEZ" Thread titles.

[Owltoid]

I'm just trying to explain that ISBoxer is fine, and I don't like fear mongering "AGAINST THE RULEZ" Thread titles.

You had the same overreaction years ago when I started a thread about removing /follow and thought I was trying to incite the community. Not all threads are fear mongering... sometimes people just like to have a discussion on what is legit and what is a gray area. There was nothing hostile in this thread. Let's all move on