Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Showing results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Acronyms.

  1. #11

    Default

    I was a bit unhappy when FTL started to catch on for the focusless/leaderless method. I always thought of it as 'for the lose'.

  2. #12

    Default

    it's a fair question. The OP is trying to post things to get past the noob limit. Better than fdswerg like I read a couple times.

    Found this looking up IMBA
    Code:
     
    A gaming lingo. 
    imba (short for imbalanced) is derived from Strategy games (e.g. Warcraft) or MMOs. It is usually used to describe when a player or a character gets way too powerful to defeat that it becomes unfair/impossible for the opponents to play against him.
    Whod a known WoW is a strategy game opposed to an MMO
    RAF Tour Guide files are obsolete, I went to Zygor
    MultiBoxers play with themselves

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alcattle View Post
    it's a fair question. The OP is trying to post things to get past the noob limit. Better than fdswerg like I read a couple times.

    Found this looking up IMBA
    Code:
     
    A gaming lingo. 
    imba (short for imbalanced) is derived from Strategy games (e.g. Warcraft) or MMOs. It is usually used to describe when a player or a character gets way too powerful to defeat that it becomes unfair/impossible for the opponents to play against him.
    Whod a known WoW is a strategy game opposed to an MMO

    Oh you youngun - back in the day warcraft was a REAL TIME STRATEGY GAME. It was so good, they made, like, 2 sequels, and multiple expansion packs. Then they went and made some bigger game called WORLD OF warcraft. And that was, like, totally different from the warcraft game, which was, you know, totally a real time strategy game. Or somethin.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbobobb View Post
    Oh you youngun - back in the day warcraft was a REAL TIME STRATEGY GAME. It was so good, they made, like, 2 sequels, and multiple expansion packs. Then they went and made some bigger game called WORLD OF warcraft. And that was, like, totally different from the warcraft game, which was, you know, totally a real time strategy game. Or somethin.
    I stand corrected. But youngun I am not, just never played Warcraft. First RPG was ultima II on the Atari 800.
    RAF Tour Guide files are obsolete, I went to Zygor
    MultiBoxers play with themselves

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alcattle View Post
    I stand corrected. But youngun I am not, just never played Warcraft. First RPG was ultima II on the Atari 800.
    My first was also Ultima II, but on the Apple ][.

    "Minax cries, 'Die, fool!'"

  6. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kate View Post
    My first was also Ultima II, but on the Apple ][.

    "Minax cries, 'Die, fool!'"
    Yeah.. one of my greatest regrets was buying Ultima in New York, travelling back home to Paris and then realising it wouldn't load on my Apple IIgs so never played it. Had to stick to Wizardry hehe. I was only 8

  7. #17

    Default

    First RTS I can remember playin was C&C on my uncle's computer, don't know what model it was. To this day, I have yet to play the first Warcraft and/or expansion for it. Played and beat 2 and 3+FT many times tho. Never played any of the Ultima games tho.

  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pocalypse View Post
    I was a bit unhappy when FTL started to catch on for the focusless/leaderless method. I always thought of it as 'for the lose'.
    I agree. I always find myself thinking "for the lose" when I read posts here

  9. #19
    dlthehunter
    Guest

    Default

    yup maybe something else than FTL could be invented ? (LL (leaderless)) ?

  10. #20

    Default

    OP: Original Poster
    .[I



Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •