Close
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Xkeys vs. Razer Naga.

    I am considering these both as another hardware option for my multi-boxing and single boxing needs.

    Has anyone used either for lotro and/or wow?

    Currently I use a G15, n52te, and a Razer Lachesis. I am considering the xkeys stick or the naga. (I Suppose eventually I will have both, but right now only one to get one.) So, which one do you guys suggest? I am considering the naga because 12 buttons on a mouse sounds great, i am concerned there will be very little programmable functions for other games than wow. Can you configure multi-function macros on the Naga? Lets use tanking for example, Press 1 to taunt, wait 500 mili seconds, press 2 for bash or whatever?

    As for the xkeys stick, how powerful is the macro software? Most games are cool with using hardware macros as long as you are at the keyboard and not using the hardware to allow the game to play while you are not there. So I am thinking if I can press a button for example to switch out of bear form, heal, switch into bear form then feral charge a runner down, that would be acceptable. I think I could do this with any of my current devices. However, i am looking for another option for more programmable buttons. I have not seen much info in regards to the Naga and programmability.

    At any rate, let me know what ya guys think. I tend to use isboxer with LOTRO when I do play lotro since I enjoy 3 boxing, so that might give you a better ability to determine which tool to purchase in regards to the game/play style I am used to.

    Thanks.

  2. #2

    Default

    1 key = 1 action in wow.

    setting up hardware macros that set off multiple timed actions is a violation of ToS and can get you banned.

    Not sure one LotRO

  3. #3

    Default

    thanks, I haven't played wow in a while so wasn't sure on that. I typically used the in game macro system with custom keybinds using n52te and its repeatable macro system, typically so I can just hold a key to repeat a key stroke every so often. I'm not looking to break the TOS, so with that in mind which piece would be the most functional and universal across most games? I suppose that is my question, more than which has "more" capabilities.

    Thanks.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frostt View Post
    repeatable macro system, typically so I can just hold a key to repeat a key stroke every so often.
    Every action must be an individual and manual event, you cannot use any sort of predetermined timing. Allowing hardware or software to decide when an action takes place {"Press 1 to taunt, wait 500 mili seconds, press 2 for bash", "hold a key to repeat a key stroke every so often"} would violate WoW's ToS. Turbine might allow it, since their stance is more against Unattended Combat Macros, but on the flip side, they could state that the actions you are taking by using external delays now means you are not controlling the characters.

    Generally, if a game does not include an internal means of timing {such as EQ and Aion, who's internal macro systems do allow the creation of macros with wait commands}, I would steer clear of using delay or repeat functions. Barring that, go for what provides you with the most effective means of button access.
    Blog : Herding Khats
    Team : Kina - Çroaker - Messkit - Lìfetaker - Wìdowmaker
    Newbie Guides : Multiboxing Vol. 1 - Multiboxing Vol. 2 - HotKeyNet - Jamba
    The Almighty Lax made a liar out of me, apparently I DO get prizes for it.
    *Commences Wielding the Banhammer like there's piñatas up in here and I'm Lady Thor*

    _ Forum search letting you down? Use the custom Google search _

  5. #5

    Default

    thanks for the kind responses. I do not want to break the TOS or any other rules set in place for wow that might get me banned. The only reason I considered "repeatable" key presses with a single key stroke is because of my tendonitis/ris, it just begins to hurt after an hour or less of play. However, like I said I'm not looking to break their rules so with that in mind which, xkeys or naga, would eliminate or reduce wrist/forearm strain without breaking the rules set in place for wow. I'm thinking naga would be the best, assuming I can bind the buttons as mb1,mb2 (mouse button1...) or f1,f2 etc. I read that the nagas preset keys are the numpad buttons...is this right? I'm assuming that can be changed to just about anything? I use bartender so rebinding keys/buttons in game is easy too.

    Thanks,

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Svpernova's Hillbilly Cousin
    Posts
    128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frostt View Post
    I read that the nagas preset keys are the numpad buttons...is this right? I'm assuming that can be changed to just about anything? I use bartender so rebinding keys/buttons in game is easy too.
    The latest Naga driver supports binding the buttons to any keystroke, so you are you not limited to just the NumPad/NumKey row.

  7. #7

    Default

    How can blizzard even detect if you're running hardware side macros? Not that I want to do it, I'm just wondering how they would even know. Would they look at ability logs and be like "he does this cast sequence in the exact same time frame, every time!" or something?
    Gramzngunz (Leader)
    Gramznguns
    Gramsngunz
    Gramsnguns

    Skullcrusher-Horde side :evil:

  8. #8

    Default

    If your abilities always happen at exactly the same interval, that would be a clue. if someone were spamming a key, it could be close, but it wouldnt be the same every time.

  9. #9

    Default

    The HID interface (that Logitech and Razer both use) exposes the looping to the application, WoW does take advantage of this. Wow seems to glitch this activity intentionally as well, likely as a 'i see you' soft warning.

    If you mean hardware side macros, like an old gateway2000 macro keyboard, that would record keystrokes, bind them to a key, and then replay them on keypress. Possibly still, depending on how the events are shoved into the various buffers / event streams. I can imagine where someone would use the warden to look at the buffer and see four stacked 'A' keys or four separate insertions and use that. (word versus character buffering, making words more suspicious)
    Last edited by HPAVC : 02-23-2010 at 06:39 PM

  10. #10

    Default

    Unless you sit cross-legged like me
    Blog : Herding Khats
    Team : Kina - Çroaker - Messkit - Lìfetaker - Wìdowmaker
    Newbie Guides : Multiboxing Vol. 1 - Multiboxing Vol. 2 - HotKeyNet - Jamba
    The Almighty Lax made a liar out of me, apparently I DO get prizes for it.
    *Commences Wielding the Banhammer like there's piñatas up in here and I'm Lady Thor*

    _ Forum search letting you down? Use the custom Google search _

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •