Close
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 33

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary, AB and Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    7638
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Mandatory Authenticators?

    Source: http://www.wow.com/2010/01/08/blizza...authenticator/

    Cross Posting from the other boxing site.
    Original post by Polyzon.

    Blizzard giving serious consideration to mandatory authenticators

    WoW.com has learned through trusted sources close to the situation that Blizzard is giving serious consideration to making authenticators mandatory on all accounts. According to our sources, while this policy has not been implemented yet and the details are not finalized, it is a virtually forgone conclusion that it will happen.

    This response is a direct effort to stop the massive number of compromised accounts by gold sellers and keyloggers. The seriousness of the situation with compromised accounts has reached such a level that wait times for item and character restoration are entirely unacceptable, even to Blizzard executives. Blizzard has taken other internal measures to deal with long wait times of people in account restoration queues, and we'll be covering those measures tomorrow.

    However, with the inclusion of mandatory authenticators, this should solve a major problem for Blizzard's support and account administration teams.

    The number of compromised accounts under the mandatory authenticator plan should plummet, if not be virtually eliminated, and players should be able to enjoy a much more secure gaming experience. While some might have a hard time with the transition, Blizzard can provide excellent support in getting all of their 11.5 million players up to speed. Indeed, we have already seen some incentive programs appear; the price of authenticators has dropped recently thanks to free shipping, and we are now rewarded with an in-game pet for having an authenticator attached to our accounts.

    A few months ago we postulated such an idea as one of our Breakfast Topics. In Why Blizzard should make authenticators mandatory, player reaction was mixed. Some saw it as a great opportunity to eliminate compromised accounts, others thought it would be an unnecessary money grabbing scheme by Blizzard.

    Perhaps the best option put forth by commenters on WoW.com was to make the authenticators mandatory with Cataclysm. Many people agreed with this, and it will be interesting to see how Blizzard rolls out their mandatory authenticator system.

    On the down side to this plan is a serious logistics problem, in that Blizzard can barely keep authenticators in stock now. They have yet to prove that they have the capacity to distribute them to millions of additional players. We are currently investigating this issue and will report back once we have more information to share.

    We do not know if authenticators will be mandatory on just WoW accounts or on any Battle.net account.




    And a Follow Up Post:

    Account Administration told not to restore hacked characters

    In a stunning revelation from a veteran account administrator at Blizzard, WoW.com has learned that account administrators are being told by Blizzard managers not to restore people's characters and items after their account has been ransacked by gold sellers and keyloggers. Instead, account administrators are being told to give people a "care package" and get them to accept the package in lieu of total account restoration.

    If the player does not accept this care package, they are then forced to go into a character restoration queue that is consistently several days to weeks long. According to sources familiar with the situation, this "care package policy" has been implemented in order to lighten the work load of those Blizzard employees who perform account restorations. Similar policies have existed at other times account compromises have been high, such as during the transition from Vanilla WoW to The Burning Crusade.

    This care package being offered consists of the following:
    • 2,500 gold
    • 2 [item=49426]Emblem of Frost[/item]
    • 10 [item=47241]Emblem of Triumph[/item] for every day the players has had to wait to receive the care package

    If the player accepts the care package, their restoration case is considered closed and no additional items or gold will be restored on the account that were lost because of the security compromise.

    WoW.com believes that this practice, while potentially making some sense logistically, stands firmly against the best interest of the players. Sources that we have spoken with tell us most account administrators do not agree with this policy, however their hands are tied due to Blizzard management (it is their job, after all, and they have to do as they're told).

    WoW.com believes Blizzard can do a better job at solving long restoration queue times without placing player's hard work as a secondary concern. Instead of offering players a care package, Blizzard can employ more staff, and as we will discuss in a later post, train those staff in better ways to prevent account compromises and exploitation. The serious consideration given to mandatory authenticators is also part of this solution.
    EverQuest I: Bard / Enchanter / Druid / Wizard / 2x Magician.
    Diablo III: 4x Crusader & 4x Wizard.

    My Guide to IS Boxer http://www.dual-boxing.com/showthread.php?t=26231 (somewhat dated).
    Streaming in 1080p HD: www.twitch.tv/ualaa
    Twitter: @Ualaa


  2. #2

    Default

    I went ahead and downloaded the authenticator for my Itouch. Better safe than sorry I suppose.

  3. #3

    Default

    Is a separate authenticator needed for each account?
    Jenzali - Troll Druid (Level 85) - Emerald Dream
    Soon to be joined by 4 other Druid buddies!

  4. #4
    Multiboxologist MiRai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Winter Is Coming
    Posts
    6815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Akoko View Post
    Is a separate authenticator needed for each account?
    No the same authenticator can be used on multiple accounts.

    Keep in mind though you can only use one authenticator code per battle.net account at a time. You must wait for the authenticator to produce another code [like 30 seconds?] before you can login the next account on that BNet account. I called Blizzard 2 days ago to have them separate my BNet account so I can once again use 1 code to login 5 accounts. The process was very painless [minus the hour that I was on hold] and the guy I was talking to didn't even know that they had changed it to 1 code per account [it used to not be like this]. You can only separate your BNet account by calling phone support. It's always been like this and I asked the representative to confirm when I called and he said that calling is still the only way to separate them.
    Last edited by MiRai : 01-08-2010 at 08:38 PM

  5. #5

    Default

    I disabled it again. It sucks big time. Take 5minutes to login with 5 accounts because it constantly says the info entered is not correct on 2-3-4 of the accounts while I login at the same time.

  6. #6
    Old Man Vecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    436
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    I disabled it again. It sucks big time. Take 5minutes to login with 5 accounts because it constantly says the info entered is not correct on 2-3-4 of the accounts while I login at the same time.
    If all your accounts are under 1 b.net account then you need to enter 1 code PER login, it no longer works for all 5. You can do what Fenril did and create 5 different b.net accounts and have 1 toon per, at this point the 1 auth code works for all 5.
    Computer Freak Social Geek

    GET OFF MY LAWN!

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    I disabled it again. It sucks big time. Take 5minutes to login with 5 accounts because it constantly says the info entered is not correct on 2-3-4 of the accounts while I login at the same time.
    It's really not that horrible. I log in one, by the time I'm loaded in, the code is ready for the next toon. I log in my alchemists first and by the time my gem transmutes are done, all my toons are in.
    Blog : Herding Khats
    Team : Kina - Çroaker - Messkit - Lìfetaker - Wìdowmaker
    Newbie Guides : Multiboxing Vol. 1 - Multiboxing Vol. 2 - HotKeyNet - Jamba
    The Almighty Lax made a liar out of me, apparently I DO get prizes for it.
    *Commences Wielding the Banhammer like there's piñatas up in here and I'm Lady Thor*

    _ Forum search letting you down? Use the custom Google search _

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary, AB and Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    7638
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    If you have each account on its own B.Net, then one code will get them all in at once.

    If you have several accounts on the same B.Net, then you will need a code per log in, with a 30 second window between each code. As in, 30 seconds per account.
    EverQuest I: Bard / Enchanter / Druid / Wizard / 2x Magician.
    Diablo III: 4x Crusader & 4x Wizard.

    My Guide to IS Boxer http://www.dual-boxing.com/showthread.php?t=26231 (somewhat dated).
    Streaming in 1080p HD: www.twitch.tv/ualaa
    Twitter: @Ualaa


  9. #9

    Default

    Authenticator sucks big time, it protects your account 100% but man when you have 5 different bnet accounts. You need to do a new code for each one.

    Just like the above poster said its like 5-8 minutes to just log in

  10. #10

    Default

    I am using an authenticator, even if it takes longer to login. I believe more security is better and it does not really matter if it takes longer for me to login.

    Still i would love an option in the battle.bet-Account to allow a timeout on the auth token instead of a single-per-account-usage-policy.

    Who knows, possibly blizzard is going to allow that in the near future.

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •