Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Showing results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: 40-boxing

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xzin View Post
    you would have to stop when a single character died.
    At 40 characters, I'd just ignore the fact that one died.

    I'm multi boxing 5 mages right now and in AV if one character dies but the rest survives, I'll often continue to run around with just the 4 that are left and pick up the dead one later.

    With 40 characters, there is no way I'd stop for 1, 2 or even 5 dead ones

  2. #12

    Default

    I don't see much point going beyond 10. Even 10 is only worth it 10% of the time. The other 90%, I'd rather just be handling 5. I mean, you could do 25 just to say, "Hey, I boxed 25-man content" but even then you quickly hit the logistical wall.

  3. #13

    Default

    I have a rogue. (which I made for this single purpose).

    Rogue invisible at flight path. 35 guys in a big circle around flight path, at max spell range.

    Rogue target guy landing (who happens to be top geared PvPer on server with 2000 kills). Others assist.

    WoW forums light up with QQ against boxers .....

    Blue posts: "If you don't want to die don't attack a raid". "If you don't want to get ganked don't play on a PvP server".


    The purpose of having 36 is to be able to say you are the strongest, you don't really have to do anything; LIke in EQ1 once I got to the point where no one could possibly beat me what was the point of actually doing anything. I just declare victory and move on to the next game.
    Last edited by Sam DeathWalker : 08-19-2009 at 02:26 PM

    28 BoXXoR RoXXoR Website
    28 Box SOLO Nalak 4m26s! Ilevel 522! GM 970 Member Guild! Multiboxing Since Mid 2001!

  4. #14
    Banned from Orbit
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The world (of Warcraft)
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boxxy1 View Post
    I'd counted, that you'll need something like:
    3 computers each like

    and 10-50mbit connection.

    I don't really think, that it is possible to level up 40 shamans at one time, so you'll need to level up each of them separately. If you'll hire comand (10ppl) of masters, they will level up it instead of you. In another case, you'll need to spend like year to grind all shamans up to 80lvl (8 day per each).
    Although, you'll need to spend 600$ per month \ 7.2k$ per year on accounts.

    What do you think about this guys?
    The 10-50mbit connection won't work. After about 30 accounts, any heavy battle will cause disconnection. What you need for 40 accounts is at least two (preferrably three) separate Internet connections. The reason is because the game prevents an amount of upload traffic from one IP address and disconnects if it is exceeded. There was a message thread that discussed the network configuration options that would allow three routers to three separate Internet connections but allow connections on your LAN so that Keyclone/Octopus or whatever could be used across all machines.

    40 shamans can be leveled without doing them separately. The way to do it is first use the Recruit-a-friend experience bonus to level 60 in separate groups doing quests. When I used RAF, I averaged a level every three or four quests. With five in each group, the group quests must be done eight times. It takes awhile to get leveled up, but far better than doing the leveling separately. Because RAF gives three times experience bonus on quests, it makes much more sense to do quests in groups than separately.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam DeathWalker View Post
    I have a rogue. (which I made for this single purpose).

    Rogue invisible at flight path. 35 guys in a big circle around flight path, at max spell range.

    Rogue target guy landing (who happens to be top geared PvPer on server with 2000 kills). Others assist.

    WoW forums light up with QQ against boxers .....

    Blue posts: "If you don't want to die don't attack a raid". "If you don't want to get ganked don't play on a PvP server".


    The purpose of having 36 is to be able to say you are the strongest, you don't really have to do anything; LIke in EQ1 once I got to the point where no one could possibly beat me what was the point of actually doing anything. I just declare victory and move on to the next game.
    I can't imagine that many people would want to multibox so many characters just for something as inane as camping a flight point. Bringing 36 characters to an AV could be interesting and challenging, mostly because it would be interesting to see how often you could win with a group that can't really split up to cap/defend multiple points across a large map. 36 characters for world PvP... I dunno. There could be some awesome moments, but they'd probably be few and far between.
    "Multibox : !! LOZERS !!" My multiboxing blog

  6. #16

    Default

    I am not sure why you would need 36-40 toons to camp a few people landing at a FP. Heck 5 is more than enough most of the time.

    5 man is insanely fun I would go as far as 10 man if I had the drive but I like what I have now.

    To each their own but without 40 man content not much point.

  7. #17

    Default

    40 magma totems at the entrance to WG. win.

  8. #18

    Default

    After about 30 accounts, any heavy battle will cause disconnection
    I have the top DSL from ATT and although i have been disconected a few times it hasn't been all that many. But then I havn't really been in big battles either.

    Each computer has a seperate IP address; Im doing 7 per computer (and main by himself). I don't think the game looks at the IP range but just spicfici address. And when I disconect it is on one computer ususally. Do you run more then 7 per computer? Of course I am in full screen mode so maybe if you tile 7 toons on one screen there might be a need for more data from the server, not sure.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DHCP

    Ok Im not sure but it seems that each computer is given its own IP. Its not like there is one master IP and the game is sending 40 information to one IP address.

    The point I am making given is that its how many clients you run per computer and not how many clients per router. But I could be wrong.

    Frankly I think you and me need to ask Blizzard to never disconnect us lol ....



    Ya 36 toons to camp a portal is a joke but the point is that you want to claim to be the strongest, you don't really have to go out and do anything if all theorycrafting shows you win. But who knows there are new things all the time 3.2 added some isl or something or other who knows what there is to do, or what there will be to do in the next expansion for 36 plus boxers.


    As for leveling Prepared has out leveled me by a ton using quests nonetheless I still tag boost and some are finding it better then questing under some circumstances.

    http://www.dual-boxing.com/showthread.php?t=23562
    Last edited by Sam DeathWalker : 08-20-2009 at 01:27 AM

    28 BoXXoR RoXXoR Website
    28 Box SOLO Nalak 4m26s! Ilevel 522! GM 970 Member Guild! Multiboxing Since Mid 2001!

  9. #19

    Default

    hey sam, what hardware do you use?

  10. #20

    Default

    amd 6400X2 3.2ghz, 9600 video, 4G ram (shows like 3.6 cause I have .5 ready boost extra). Far from great but good enough for 7 clients at 1280 X 960 most stuff off.

    Its the 3.2ghz speed that makes my stuff look better. So 6 computers like that with 7 X 5 and the main by himself at 1600 X 1200 everything cept shadows on.

    28 BoXXoR RoXXoR Website
    28 Box SOLO Nalak 4m26s! Ilevel 522! GM 970 Member Guild! Multiboxing Since Mid 2001!

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •