Close
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 23

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned from Orbit
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The world (of Warcraft)
    Posts
    304

    Default Got an idea, need suggestion or advice

    Some of you know that I'm working on a bunch of shamans and a mixed team of classes. An issue that I've run into while boxing a lot of characters has been that during a big battle, all characters can get disconnected at the same time. This happens more often at about 40 characters at the same time. I've dropped down to trying to box 36, then trying 30, but it can still happen usually during Wintergrasp when there are a lot of players around casting various spells, etc. Now keep in mind, I have all my graphics turned down for all of my instances across all of my computers. I'm not running anything I don't need outside of the game. I'm using only 3 AddOns along with Octopus 1.3.2.

    My idea is to have multiple Internet cable services to my house. This would allow me to use a router for each Internet Service Provider. The major issue I see with this, other than it costs more, is that the machines connected to each router would only know about the IP addresses of the machines on that network. So Octopus wouldn't be able to connect to the machines on a different router that is connected to the other service provider. In solving that, I would think a 2nd network card in each machine would allow connectivity to all machines so that Octopus would be able to connect to all machines. The other way would be to have a wireless router that would allow connectivity to all machines while the network card in each machine controls how they would connect to the Internet through the router used for the service provider they are attached to.

    If anyone has any other ideas, suggestions or constructive comments, please post.


    Thanks
    Prepared (multiboxer of some Horde characters on Aegwynn)

  2. #2

    Default

    I am not a network administrator, but it sounds like a subnet problem.

    Alternately, couldn't you just set the gateway IP differently for each group? I have, dunno, probably three routers working on my home network at any given time. They don't fight, or at least they don't anymore - it's a configuration issue, not an insurmountable one. You connect all three ISP gateway devices to the same network and use an additional hub / router (or more) to connect everything. Each then has an IP on your LAN, and a computer will connect to the internet through whichever you give it an IP for.

  3. #3

    Default

    I never used octopus so I haven't really kept up with its configuration methods. But you could buy 2 commercial routers, Linksys dlink etc, and configure 1 with a private ip of "192.168.1.1" and the second as "192.168.2.1". And on each of those, configure a static route so A will connect to B, and B will connect to A. They are very easy to configure.

    The other problem with your trying to do, if you configure it like this where router A is on a Billy bob's cable connection, and router B is on Joe Smoe's DSL, both ISP networks will use a common routing protocol called OSPF (Open shortest path first). If both ISP networks are configured, chances are you will end up using only 1 connection to send and receive to the source destination IP address, no matter how many connections from your home network you provide.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Shortest_Path_First

    A way around this would keep your 2 networks apart from each other, but can octopus send key information over the internet, or does it require private networks? If it could then you'll have to configure port forwarding information on your 2 routers.

    Never use wireless, hubs, or commercial Linksys dlink etc workgroup switches for the ammount of devices your are talking about. These devices share throughput across it's connections limiting your further. But chances are your bottle neck would lie in your connection out vs. your home network. You can call your ISP and usually "upgrade" your bandwidth. Unless your on a DSL connection, then your pretty limited based on your location. Moving from a residential packages to a more business package.



    Hope this helped you some.

  4. #4

    Default

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-homed

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/157025

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...ulti-homed&lr=


    I dont know for sure but MAYBE get two seperate 1G switches, connect together for a lan. Have output of each switch also go to a seperate router and the routers to the internets. 2 switches and 2 routers needed. Otherwise there are products with two wan ports (not cheap).

    You have 40 accounts that you run seperatly now?

    You might also talk to Blizzard if they send to much information to a single IP they might think its a farm or something and have some auto shut down, tell them whats up.

    28 BoXXoR RoXXoR Website
    28 Box SOLO Nalak 4m26s! Ilevel 522! GM 970 Member Guild! Multiboxing Since Mid 2001!

  5. #5

    Default

    algol is correct.. All you need to do is have the multiple connections on the same subnet, disable DHCP on the routers and assign static IP and DNS to each computer, pointing each relevant PC's gateway to the router you want to use for your outbound connection. I have used this method for A gaming suite in a hotel room where we had 12 PC's and 3x 8mb ADSL connections. Having different gateways is only an issue if you are trying to talk to machines on different subnets (as they will all be on the same network range this works really well for programs like ocotopus/keyclone.HKN).

    I have attached a quick diagram to show what i mean. DHCP is enabled on router 1 to allow for other machines to connect to the network and still access the internet (ie laptops)

    any probs give me a shout

    ​

  6. #6

    Default

    Well ya that seems a lot cheaper then my suggestions .....

    28 BoXXoR RoXXoR Website
    28 Box SOLO Nalak 4m26s! Ilevel 522! GM 970 Member Guild! Multiboxing Since Mid 2001!

  7. #7

    Default

    Dunno if you have cablevision in your area but right now they are offering 100mbps down and 50mbps up for $110 you might wanna look into that and use one high speed switch with it.
    [align=justify]i7 920 - GTX 285 - 12GB Corsair 1600 [/align]
    Pally,Shaman,Shaman,Shaman,Shaman
    Dk,Hunter,Druid,Warlock,Priest

  8. #8

    Default

    I'm a bit out of my league here, but you could use HKN as your key broadcasting program. It will work on "remote" computers through using IP addresses.
    Owltoid, Thatblueguy, Thisblueguy, Otherblueguy, Whichblueguy

  9. #9

    Default

    The main thing you have to remember is that you have to have a router that is intelligent enough to know when one of your routes to the internet is down. This is the key. As Mooglej suggested, this could be accomplished with the help of your ISPs (if they are small enough to care This may be costly even if they are willing to do a special setup for you, but frankly, most common providers won't even have the capability to provide an OSPF setup like that using standard DSL installed equipment. They'd need to have some expensive hardware at your home that terminates each of your even more expensive connections (think T1, if you know what I mean).



    You should look into setting up a PC specifically for routing, using something like m0n0wall or pfsense. You'll need to set up this router between your game machines and your multiple ISP connections. The router needs to have code running to keep track of which routes are up, and you'll be good to go.

  10. #10

    Default

    Can you list your current network setup?
    Tunak Tunka Tun Tunák, TunákTunák, TunákTun, DáDáDá | Garrosh - Emberstorm - Alliance

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for advice on a ClickSequence/Macro idea
    By Jaybarti in forum Macros and Addons
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-06-2008, 07:25 PM
  2. suggestion
    By gigauae in forum Hardware Tools
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 10:59 PM
  3. Suggestion
    By vblifeline in forum Software Tools
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 09:10 PM
  4. Looking for a KVM suggestion
    By Kinex in forum Hardware Tools
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-01-2008, 02:24 PM
  5. Suggestion We need One
    By Diamndzngunz in forum New Multi-Boxers & Support
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 07:34 AM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •