Problems with group invites workaround

[DgtlSorcrs]

Remove this from your macro and it won't auto-deny:
/script StaticPopup_Hide("PARTY_INVITE");
However, it will leave the invite popup opened.

Similar behavior occurs with:
/script StaticPopup_Hide("QUEST_ACCEPT");

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test that one as I haven't run into any party-wide-event quests since the update.

Thanks for the heads-up... will see about using a similar workaround for that functionality. Makes sense I guess... just didn't occur to me.

Thanks.

UPDATE:
Just checked the Blizzard interface code, and the definition for QUEST_ACCEPT is quite different from PARTY_INVITE. Specifically, PARTY_INVITE looks like they have a "if I'm hidden and they didn't click yes, then DeclineGroup() whereas the QUEST_ACCEPT code just has either AcceptQuest() if they click yes and no Decline path.

I'm far from an expert, and if you're telling me you've seen this activity, then I need to dig deeper as it doesn't appear to be accepting/declining in the same way that the PARTY_INVITE does.

from blizzard interface staticPopup.lua:

StaticPopupDialogs["PARTY_INVITE"] = {
	text = INVITATION,
	button1 = ACCEPT,
	button2 = DECLINE,
	sound = "igPlayerInvite",
	OnShow = function(self)
		self.inviteAccepted = nil;
	end,
	OnAccept = function(self)
		AcceptGroup();
		self.inviteAccepted = 1;
	end,
	OnCancel = function(self)
		DeclineGroup();
	end,
	OnHide = function(self)
		if ( not self.inviteAccepted ) then
			DeclineGroup();
			self:Hide();
		end
	end,
	timeout = 60,
	whileDead = 1,
	hideOnEscape = 1
};

See how it defines OnHide with a check for whether they accepted and if not, to decline?

Now, here's the definition for QUEST_ACCEPT:

StaticPopupDialogs["QUEST_ACCEPT"] = {
	text = QUEST_ACCEPT,
	button1 = YES,
	button2 = NO,
	OnAccept = function(self)
		ConfirmAcceptQuest();
	end,
	timeout = 0,
	exclusive = 1,
	hideOnEscape = 1
};

So, there's no explicit Decline going on there.

Again, this is just my interpretation of the Bliz interface code and I could very easily be wrong.