can someone not percieved as "anti mod" - a moderator for instance - then restart said poll; I propose the following choice

Preface: moderation is a thankless job, we are or should all be thankful for the work done, even if/when we don't like the outcome. This isn't an "attack" on moderators; but a poll to figure out how the member community perceives the moderation - even if 99% of people would say "there isn't enough" or "there is too much" there is no guarantee that anything would change because it's Ellay's house anyway but maybe the input can be valuable - also for members to see how the spectrum of perceptions is :

Moderation in general
* I think the moderation is done just right
* I think the moderation is heavy handed (feel free to reword if that's 'offsensive')
* I think there isn't enough moderation
* I'm glad I don't see ton of crap so I suppose it's done right but can't comment on it as I don't see the "raw" original sewage (I guess that's same as "done just right" or maybe "I don't know")

Threadlock in particular
* I think threadlocking should be avoided - if a couple people drag on a thread endlessly give those people a warning or indicate in the thread what specifically needs to stop but not the whole thread (ok that's longish, need to find a short version : "we shouldn't need threadlocking except extreme circumstances" ?
* I think more threads should be locked; faster
* I think thread locking is used just right