Close
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Showing results 41 to 50 of 67

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Stealthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1450

    Default

    Only theorycrafting, but if I were boxing mages up against shammies, I'd go for either of these strategies.

    1. Pop mirror image, water eles then invis and move to the centre of shammie grp - then go nuts with AoE - would work best with Belf mages since they could pop arcane torrent to prevent Shammies from using TS.
    2. Pop mirror image, water eles, have an instant cast spell like Ice Lance on round robin to take care of groundings, use Iceblock to eat LvB and clear FS dots, cold snap immediately making Ice Block availble again.

    Cheers,
    S.
    The Zerg (Magtheridon - US)

    Fact of Life: After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says W T F.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Stealthy',index.php?page=Thread&postID=186563#pos t186563
    Only theorycrafting, but if I were boxing mages up against shammies, I'd go for either of these strategies.

    1. Pop mirror image, water eles then invis and move to the centre of shammie grp - then go nuts with AoE - would work best with Belf mages since they could pop arcane torrent to prevent Shammies from using TS.
    2. Pop mirror image, water eles, have an instant cast spell like Ice Lance on round robin to take care of groundings, use Iceblock to eat LvB and clear FS dots, cold snap immediately making Ice Block availble again.

    Cheers,
    S.
    I've seen a few mage vs shaman battles before.

    The mages won around 90% of the matches though this WAS at the very end of Pre BC just before WotlK so this have changed dramatically. The main advantage the mages had at the time was aoe. I'd still bet my money on mages these days but that would be based purely on theory rather than on actual experience. Invis, Mirror image trinket/ap(if you have it) blastwave /ae etc.

    Who knows.

  3. #3
    Banned from Orbit
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The world (of Warcraft)
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Sorry to burst in here but a good PvP multiboxing mage would do none of the things in any of the posts here. To cast a fireball against a multiboxing team of shamans would be a complete waste of time on the mages part. A good pvp mage would not do that. He would also not invis to get into the middle or blink into the middle of the shamans. The shamans should all have Lightning Shield up which would cause damage against the AE'ing mages.

    The thing the good PvP mage would do against a multiboxing team of shamans would be to cast Blizzard on them as far away as possible. If the mages were frost spec, the shamans would have little to no chance especially if the mages were facing the opposite side of the shamans. In my PvP experience against mages that cast Blizzard, the multiboxing shaman has very little to defend especially if there are group of targeted AoE classes casting from a distance. Targetted AoE is the best offense against any multiboxer because the multiboxer usually has all of their characters together. Unless I'm missing or forgetting something, the shaman doesn't have a targetted AoE spell, but the mage class does and is his/her best offensive spell.

    Now, all things being equal, if both of the multiboxers knew of each other, met each other on some battlefield without any other players around and they spotted each other, it would be more fair than if one of them spotted the other and got the jump. But alas, in most battles that is not the case. One side usually sees the other first and usually it's from the side or from behind. And usually there are many other players around fighting the battle so it's really a numbers game and a location game. In other words, where the numbers are on the battlefield usually indicate the outcome of the battle and who wins in which locations. The element of surprise also plays a big part.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Prepared',index.php?page=Thread&postID=186567#pos t186567
    Sorry to burst in here but a good PvP multiboxing mage would do none of the things in any of the posts here. To cast a fireball against a multiboxing team of shamans would be a complete waste of time on the mages part. A good pvp mage would not do that. He would also not invis to get into the middle or blink into the middle of the shamans. The shamans should all have Lightning Shield up which would cause damage against the AE'ing mages.

    The thing the good PvP mage would do against a multiboxing team of shamans would be to cast Blizzard on them as far away as possible. If the mages were frost spec, the shamans would have little to no chance especially if the mages were facing the opposite side of the shamans. In my PvP experience against mages that cast Blizzard, the multiboxing shaman has very little to defend especially if there are group of targeted AoE classes casting from a distance. Targetted AoE is the best offense against any multiboxer because the multiboxer usually has all of their characters together. Unless I'm missing or forgetting something, the shaman doesn't have a targetted AoE spell, but the mage class does and is his/her best offensive spell.

    Now, all things being equal, if both of the multiboxers knew of each other, met each other on some battlefield without any other players around and they spotted each other, it would be more fair than if one of them spotted the other and got the jump. But alas, in most battles that is not the case. One side usually sees the other first and usually it's from the side or from behind. And usually there are many other players around fighting the battle so it's really a numbers game and a location game. In other words, where the numbers are on the battlefield usually indicate the outcome of the battle and who wins in which locations. The element of surprise also plays a big part.
    Even after winning against all three shaman multiboxers I guess I'm still considered a bad mage then.

  5. #5

    Default

    Well that makes sense, no matter how hard the Shamans can hit the mages at 36 yards, 5 Blizzards will hit the Shamans way way harder.

  6. #6

    Default

    Note that if you reopened the <name removed> thread maybe the insanity could be contained there...
    2,3,5 boxing wow with Wow Open Box and MAMA, give them a try!
    (was 8 Boxing Wow with HotKeyNet and ISBoxer)
    Was streaming on twitch.tv/MooreaTv

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Fursphere',index.php?page=Thread&postID=186598#po st186598
    If somebody would just take a stand and ban the jerk, all these problems would go away.
    What, for example somebody with moderator status?

  8. #8

    Default

    It's not fair to ban <Name Removed> because he hasn't done anything wrong. Yes, some of the outlandish remarks he makes about things he doesn't have a clue about grates on your nerves, but in reality what's the harm in that? Every time he spouts off something wrong, there is always someone willing to counter his argument, and thoroughly I might add. For every "Head-up-my-ass" statement of his is met by a minimum to two "yer full of shit"s.

    I may not like <Name Removed> and the circus that comes with him, but I'd probably be one of the first people to yell if he was banned.

    Annoying isn't bannable. Misinformation shouldn't be bannable if he isn't peddling anything. Eccentric isn't bannable. Of course, our moderators can ban for anything, but no matter how gawddamn annoying <Name Removed> is, he hasn't really done anything which he should be banned for.
    Greatlegs - Pally | Appaton, Belisaur, Coramonde - Elem Shaman | Zenock - Resto Shaman
    Unguilded but <I Service Myself> was created for them
    US - Kul'Tiras
    Living in the deserted Outlands - Level 70

  9. #9

    Default

    Back in TBC (When I still did Arena :P ) I fought a 5x mage set up once, me playing 4x shaman + individual healer

    Out of ALL the arena I ever did. That was by far the most hectic fight ever. I actually won. Grounding totems and waiting them out, nuking one down before they had a chance to start. But even then it was just wicked. The actual heat of the fight literally only lasted like 4-5 seconds, and like 7 people were dead in that time. (Two of me, four of them. It then lasted for a while longer as their last mage started to kite. :P )

    I think, mages vs shaman boxer. It's all down to who gets off the start. Refreshing grounding totems won't matter. As the fight will be decided before groundings can be refreshed. If the mage boxer waits until the moment the shaman boxers drops groundings, then proceeds to blink in, get rid of totems. It would seriously be a close call. Imo. But a second off, and the tide would be turned.

    Most fun fight I ever did. :P
    Slowly crawling back towards the experience that is Multiboxing Mayhem

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Sam DeathWalker',index.php?page=Thread&postID=186084#p ost186084
    Well whatever, I think more then conclusory allegation would promote yur position, but Ill defer and read how it goes and get back to leveling.

    I find it hard to belive that a 5 yard range advantage is useless but whatever.

    Mages + 5yards = useless:

    very easy to understand because

    a)
    when I'm at max range and I see you start casting a 3,5 sec. spell I just move 2 steps backward.
    You cannot move while casting, and get the "out of range" message when your cast is ready so you need to move forward to
    get me in range while I ran in your direction so I'm in range for an instant cast and run backward out of range again before
    you're ready with your 3,5 sec. cast.

    b)
    bloodelves got an AOE Silence effect. I doesn't take 3,5 seconds to move 40 yards forwards to be close enough to silence all of your chars.

    c)
    I bet you can not turn your chars. If I ride pass your toons your heading in the wrong direction
    so the cast failes while I start attacking your toons.


    so plz stop with this theory crap and start playing this game!
    [align=center]
    Deutscher Multi-Boxing Blog mit Tutorials, Einleitungen, Hardware-Setups ....
    Klickt hier und ihr werdet erleuchtet: http://beyond-tec.blogspot.com
    [/align]

Similar Threads

  1. The Ultimate in Multiboxing...
    By oogally in forum Screenshots and Digital Art
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-16-2009, 06:11 PM
  2. [Ultimate] All-Purpose Rig
    By MaltheMM in forum Hardware Tools
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 08:35 PM
  3. The Ultimate UI?
    By Tdog in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-02-2008, 02:34 PM
  4. The ultimate 5 for PVP (Multiboxing)
    By shaeman in forum PvP Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-29-2008, 12:29 AM
  5. Help with the Ultimate Rig
    By entoptic in forum New Multi-Boxers & Support
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 03:54 AM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •