Close
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Showing results 21 to 30 of 73
  1. #21

  2. #22

    Default

    I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.
    Basilikos
    Icecrown US Alliance

    Mixed Group of Unholy DeathKnight, Holy Priest, Elemental/Restoration Shaman, Arcane Mage, Balance/Restoration Druid
    Second Mixed group of Protection Paladin, Discipline Priest, Fire Mage, Affliction Warlock, Affliction Warlock

    5 Balance Druids - Shelved at 65
    Holy Priest and 4 Warlocks - Shelved at 71
    Protection Paladin and 4 Shadow Priests - Shelved at 60
    5 Elemental Shaman - Shelved at 60

  3. #23

    Default

    ENTJ for me.

    Extraverted = 22%
    Intuitive = 38%
    Thinking = 50%
    Judging = 22%

    edited for %s

  4. #24

    Default

    I'm INXx, the last two dichotomies change depending on my environment and personal mood.
    big X is pretty evenly split
    small x tends slightly towards P
    Someguy: "You must really like playing with yourself"
    Me: "OH HELLS YEAH!"

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'Basilikos',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183935#po st183935
    I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.
    yea.. i think putting people into 16 different categories based on four different variables with each variable having only two values is a bit simplified. but im sure its simplified for a reason. for all intensive purposes though, the categories do their jobs well.

  6. #26

    Default

    INTJ

    Famous people of your particular type:
    Isaac Newton, Niels Bohr, C. G. Jung, Michel de Montaigne, Michel Nostradamus, Ada Lovelace


    Rut roh :whistling:
    (48x5) 1xPaly, 3x Hunters, 1x Shaman, Ysera Horde
    (80x5) 1x Prot Warr, 3x Hybrid Warlock, 1x Resto Sham (retired)
    (64x5) 1xPally, 3x Ele. Sham, 1x Resto Sham, KM Alliance (retired)
    Extras: (80) 1x Demon Lock, 1x Prot Warr; KM Alliance
    (70) 1x Hunter, Mage, Prot Warr, Warlock; Teranas Horde (retired)

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 'elsegundo',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183976#po st183976
    Quote Originally Posted by 'Basilikos',index.php?page=Thread&postID=183935#po st183935
    I did a little more reading on this and as it turns out, there are varying degrees of each indicator. Mine (fluctuates by mood): I (66%) N (55-60%) T (76-100%) J (100%). I actually think I agree with those tests and the varying results I've got since I tend to see the value in a little bit of variance in my own life. What I'd like to know now is if the other (just picking one as an example) 33% of the "I" is actually "E" or not.
    yea.. i think putting people into 16 different categories based on four different variables with each variable having only two values is a bit simplified. but im sure its simplified for a reason. for all intensive purposes though, the categories do their jobs well.
    Yes, the original MB definition used dichotomies for establishing classification and following the "omg everything has to be classified" ideology of its time.

    Subsequent refinements, especially business batteries, usually give a spectrum score.

    Still, other batteries attempt to describe people who get vastly different results from MB at different times. Usually one or two dichotomies stay static, and the other two vary.
    Someguy: "You must really like playing with yourself"
    Me: "OH HELLS YEAH!"

  8. #28

    Default

    ESFP. Florence Littauer's Personality Plus is awesome as well. I tend to like it better than Meyer's-Briggs.
    "My dogs could roll heroics with how a lot of you play."
    - Fursphere 2010




  9. #29

    Default

    INTJ

    It says I'm smarter than you but that I'll let you think you're smarter than me because I'm lazy.
    Kaegro/Unilia/Zaele's

  10. #30

    Default

    I am an ENTJ.

    My mother did a lot of research and personality analyzation when I was much younger so this is something I've known for a while. Very interesting stuff...

Similar Threads

  1. "New" type of game
    By X-Ifist in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2009, 09:57 PM
  2. Which type of audio do you like on videos?
    By Talamarr in forum Movies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-04-2009, 09:02 PM
  3. New type of hater.
    By Velassra in forum General WoW Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-09-2008, 11:18 PM
  4. Addictive personality
    By dancook in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-15-2008, 06:25 PM
  5. Type of computer to get.
    By Psychomages in forum New Multi-Boxers & Support
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-15-2008, 07:02 AM

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •