From the above linked storagereview benchmarks:
World of Warcraft Performance
A capture of a role-playing game that issues disk accesses when switching continents/dungeons as well as when loading new textures into RAM on the fly.
World of Warcraft Performance
Rank Drive Name Model Results in IO/Sec
1 MTRON MSP-SATA7035-64 (64 GB SATA) MSP-SATA7035-064 3333
2 MTRON MSD-SATA3035-064 (64 GB SATA) MSD-SATA3035-64 3030
3 Fujitsu MAU (147 GB Ultra320 SCSI) MAU3147NP 885
4 Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS (300 GB SATA) WD3000GLFS 840
5 Seagate Cheetah 15K.4 Desktop Mode (147 GB Ultra320 SCSI) ST3146754LW 833
6 Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000BLFS (300 GB SATA) WD3000BLFS 833
7 Hitachi Deskstar E7K1000 with NCQ (1000 GB SATA) HTE721010SLA330 806
8 Seagate Cheetah 15K.4 Server Mode (147 GB SAS) ST3146854SS 787
You can see, according the them, wow is 4X faster on the Mtron SSD vs. a Veloraptor.
Also they indicate that textures ARE loaded on the fly.
Interestingly the 36G raptors are way worse then the 300G raptors ... hum ... How can you possibly umm duplicate the same test anyways. Wont you always run into different characters?
The fastest Raptor / VeloRaptor has 16M cache
Connect With Us