To 2 box or 3 box, that is the question!

[uberfail]

you get group XP when questing (will be significant after 60 when RAF no longer applies) and you can max out more professions. Sure, there are a handful of quests that 3 can complete but 2 might have trouble.

See I knew the group xp would be better with 2 Raf accounts and a main but didn't know that after lv 60 it helped. Good info thanks!

So, you could still give 5 boxing a try and then cancel the subscriptions before the monthlies start rolling in.

Still, money is the BIG issue for me, all in all I am a tight wad with cash and I don't have excesive amounts of it either. THe main reason for not 5 boxing I suppose

Four has a lot of advantages, five allows you to run your own group... Three is just an awkward number.

How did you guess I had a duo core XD good call, it simply out performs the quads out there right now, and I do play other games that wow so I wanted the boost and went for an E8400 at 3.0, been nice so far, haven't needed to OC it yet. (then again I am not playing Crysiss XD )

Back on track though > why is 3 awkward? I can see compaired to 5boxing why, but compaired to quad boxing? And if there were enough really good "advantages" to quad boxing it would be VERY tempting, almost enough to try it. Depends though... in pvp an dual boxing can have a fun advantage ("can" but not always, there are certain issues I can see already), are a quad of shaman able to do a 5 man instance if tehy gear up enough the instance before it? Not heroics or anything but just curious. Of course this will then get another poster who says "heck if you 4 box then why not 5 box, you are right there and that is where it is really at etc."

Anywho thank you much on the info so far!

EDIT: Keyclone got in while I was typing, and I like his idea initially. Though I wonder if a tank and 2 dps would wotk then find a dps healer for my group? or one of each "classic" role (tank,dps,healing) and then 2 other dps witch is easiest to find. more random thoughts.