I bet you can read this, OLD but very FUN

[Chaosomega]

I jsut wetnad to witre a ltilte smoetihng to all the mltuibxores wtih tshee samrclebd wdros. I hpoe you are pniickg tihs up esle it wluod vrey emrarabinsg for me if you didnt.

Hlelo mltuibxores gald to be a mbemer of tihs cuimtomny. Pcaee out.

[Frosty]

My Brain....it hurts!!! :P

[Creazil]

I've seen something like this once before - I think it has something with the first and last letter to do, I mean if those are correct we can read it pretty easily

[Maxion]

That is precisely it.

[Coltimar]

It's not funny to pick on the dyslexic kid I have been diagnosed paranoid dyslexic. I always feel like I'm following someone. I used to be atheistic dyslexic. I didn't believe in Dog.

[Ualaa]

My aunt forwarded me an email at one point.
Not sure where it is any longer.

It was a letter written entirely like that.
Except instead of a few lines, it was a doctor in some Californian university who had a thesis on word recognition in the brain.
And the letter was a full screen in length.

Like your above post, you could read the whole thing at only slightly slower then a normal reading pace.
If the first and last letters are correct, and the word has the proper number of letters, the brain picks it up very easily.

[bodefeld]

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Further reading here.

[Kaynin]

You do know, despite the fact people can read that stuff just as easy, that it requires twice the amount of effort writing it down like that?

All you writers are like dual-boxers without key cloning! Aha! xD

[Cooolr]

Wow, I can read it.
I'm the magical unscrambler.

lol.

Yeah, if the first and the last word is correct then you can read it, I wonder if there is any other way? (Besides the correct way and this way)