Quote Originally Posted by Otlecs
they still changed a legally binding (or is it? ) contract which you signed wihtout your approval/you had no say in the change. It's not about wether or not the changes are acceptable or not, it's just the fact that there was made changes that you weren't aware of and/or changes that you had no say in.
Every time they change the EULA (and often when there's a client patch with no EULA changes!!) you have to re-click on that "I AGREE" button. That IS your approval of the agreement in its entirety.
This is exactly what I was trying to explain, so let me simplify it a bit, just to make my point clearer:

You buy something which you pay a fixed ammount of money for.

Buy buying the product, you automaticly get a certain set of rights. If the product is not up to the standards you belived it to be in/it's incomplete/you cannot use it due to conditions presented to you at a later given time, you have the right to return it

You pay a certain ammount of money a month to use the product.

Now, the question I'm raising is, if these conditions change after you've paid for the use of the product for x ammount of months, then what sort of compasation are you entitled to? Money back for the product? For all of the subscribtion-time?

So IF Blizzard were to change the EULA into some sort of horror script, what would you be entitled to?

And seeing as it's not always changed and you still have to accept it, if you then accepting beliveing no changes were made (to the full extent of your knowledge), then are you entitleded to any form of compasation?

And quite frankly, the gold-farming case and a case such as I'm describing above are different in quite a few ways and would most likely not be treated the same way.